摘要
生成式人工智能的侵权责任,在理论上可以从产品责任和一般侵权责任两种路径进行分析。在当前的法律框架下,对于以大语言模型为代表的生成式人工智能系统而言,不宜将其纳入到产品责任的范畴,而宜通过一般侵权责任制度并辅之以过错推定规则,这样既可以解决受害人的举证困难问题,也便于通过司法控制机制对生成式人工智能提供者的责任负担进行动态调整。为了维持生成式人工智能提供者与受害人之间的利益平衡,可以通过“通知—处置”规则对提供者施加消除侵权信息影响并防止系统再次生成侵权信息的义务。
The liability for infringement caused by generative artificial intelligence(AI)can be analyzed theoretically from two paths:product liability and general tort liability.However,within the current legal framework,it is not appropriate to classify generative AI systems,characterized by large language models,under product liability.Instead,it is more suitable to address them through general tort liability,accompanied by rules of presumed fault.This approach not only helps resolve the burden of proof faced by the victims,but also enables the dynamic adjustment of liability for generative AI providers through judicial control mechanisms.To maintain a balance of interests between generative AI providers and the victims,a"notice-and-takedown"rule can be implemented,imposing an obligation on providers to eliminate the impact of infringing information and prevent the system from generating such information again.
出处
《比较法研究》
北大核心
2023年第4期117-131,共15页
Journal of Comparative Law
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“信息法基础”(项目编号:16ZDA075)
中央高校基本科研业务费项目“数字法治基础理论研究”(项目编号:YWF-23-W-203)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
生成式人工智能
人工智能生成内容
产品责任
过错责任
generative Al
artificial intelligence generated content
product liability
fault liability