期刊文献+

中韩义务教育数学课程标准的比较与启示

A Comparative Study of Mathematics Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education in China and South Korea and Its Enlightenment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国与韩国在2022年相继颁布了义务教育数学课程标准,通过对两国数学课程标准前言、性质与理念、课程目标、课程内容、实施建议五部分的比较发现,两者存在一定的共性,但也有着显著的区别。分析发现,我国数学课程标准的立意层次更高、内容辐射面更广,而韩国数学课程标准更简明扼要,对教师具有更强的实践指导性;我国数学课程标准以“核心素养”为主轴,注重数学课程的育人性,韩国数学课程标准以“核心理念”为主轴,注重学生数学学科力量的培养;两国均注重课程知识的结构化整合,也都关注信息技术与数学教学融合,但缺乏相应的实施指导。在新时代发展背景下,创新型人才的培养成为两国数学课程的共同追求,韩国数学课程标准有着更为明确的指导性建议。中小学校应组织数学教师对课程标准进行解读、深入研究,为教师的教学实施提供参考,在充分发挥我国数学课程标准内容全面的基础上,有效吸收韩国数学课程标准便捷和可操作性强的优点。 China and South Korea successively issued compulsory education mathematics curriculum standards in 2022.Comparing five parts of the two countries'mathematics curriculum standards,which are introduction,nature and philosophy,curriculum objectives,curriculum content,and implementation suggestions,it is found that there are certain commonalities and significant differences between the two standards.The analysis has found that China's mathematics curriculum standards demonstrate higher level of intention and wider coverage of content,while South Korea's mathematics curriculum standards are more concise,providing stronger practical guidance for teachers.China's mathematics curriculum standards focus on"core competencies"and emphasize the educational nature of mathematics courses,while South Korea's mathematics curriculum standards focus on"core concepts"and the cultivation of students'mathematical subject strength.Both countries emphasize the structural integration of curriculum knowledge and the integration of information technology and mathematics teaching,but the implementation guidance lacks in both versions.In the context of the development of the new era,the cultivation of innovative talents has become the common pursuit of mathematics education in both countries,but the Korean curriculum standards have clearer guiding suggestions.Primary and secondary schools should organize mathematics teachers to interpret and conduct in-depth researches on the curriculum standards,providing reference for teachers'teaching implementation.These strategies could fully promote the advantages of comprehensive content in China's mathematics curriculum standards,and be effective to help teachers absorb the advantages of convenient and operability in South Korea's mathematics curriculum standards.
作者 尚宇飞 黄友初 SHANG Yufei;HUANG Youchu(College of Education,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China)
出处 《比较教育学报》 北大核心 2023年第4期148-159,共12页 Journal of Comparative Education
基金 国家自然科学基金项目“维汉双语小学数学文化读物的编撰与推广”(项目编号:12026502)。
关键词 义务教育 中国数学课程标准 韩国数学课程标准 比较研究 compulsory education Chinese Mathematics Curriculum Standards Korean Mathematics Curriculum Standards comparative study
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献69

  • 1史宁中,孔凡哲,李淑文.课程难度模型:我国义务教育几何课程难度的对比[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(6):151-155. 被引量:171
  • 2李文.东亚的现代化与民族文化[J].当代亚太,2006(12):45-51. 被引量:4
  • 3许介鳞.《汉字文化圈的构想》,http://www.japantesearch.org.tw/china/director.
  • 4赵汝适.《诸番志》,三佛齐国条.
  • 5袁冰凌.《罗芳伯与西婆罗州的开拓》,载于郑赤琰编.《客家与东南亚》,三联书店(香港)有限公司,2002年版.第238-429页.
  • 6袁冰凌.《罗芳伯与西婆罗州的开拓》,见中国历史研究会编.《中国通史简编》,人民出版社,1950年版,第966-971页.
  • 7陈伯海.《东亚文化与文化东亚》,上海社会科学院东亚文化研究中心编.《东亚文化论谭》,上海文艺出版社,1998年版.
  • 8范寿康著.《日本公民教育》.
  • 9李光耀.《全球化过程中的东亚文化》,《文汇报》2004年5月7日.
  • 10布鲁纳.布鲁纳教育论著选[M].邵瑞珍,等译.北京:人民教育出版社,1989.

共引文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部