摘要
佛教四大宗派对“三时”持有不同的观点,其中分别说部和经量部之间更是大相径庭。就藏传量学而言,将“三时”作为专题的研究成果相对较少。而西方哲学家在很早时期就对这一概念列为专题,进行了颇为细致的研究,也提出了诸多不同观点。但在多数研究成果中,采用跨学科视阈和比较研究法的颇为罕见。将分别说部、经量部与西方哲学家“三时”观进行比较研究,能够在突破传统研究视阈盲点的基础上,打破理论和方法上的界限,从不同文化的逻辑视角赋予研究对象新的活力,对于该研究领域的现代化具有重要的理论意义。
The four major schools of Buddhism hold different views on the time,among which the Vaibhashika And Sautrantikas are quite different.As far as Tibetan bibliography is concerned,there are relatively few research results on time as a special topic.However,western philosophers have professionally researched on this concept since a very long time ago,and have also put forward many different views.However,in most of the research results,the use of interdisciplinary perspective and comparative research method is quite rare.A comparative study of the theory of Vaibhashika And Sautrantikas and the view of western philosophers on time can break through the blind spot of traditional research vision,break the boundary of theory and method,and endow the research object with new vitality from the logical perspective of different cultures,which has important theoretical significance for the modernization of this research field.
作者
仁增加
曼拉加
Rig-’dzin-rgyal;Sman-bla-skyabs
基金
青海民族大学研究生院创新项目“藏传因明辩论与法庭论辩比较研究”阶段性成果,项目编号:03M2022015。