马克思与恩格斯在跨越“卡夫丁峡谷”设想上是否对立

Are Marx and Engels Opposed to Each Other on the Idea of Crossing the“Caudine Valley”?

跨越“卡夫丁峡谷”设想是马克思与恩格斯运用唯物史观分析俄国农村公社历史命运问题的共同理论结晶。在该设想上,诺曼·莱文等学者制造了“马恩对立论”,割裂了马克思主义的整体性,因而必须从理论上对其予以批驳。事实上,由于马克思与恩格斯所处社会历史背景及其具体针对性的不同,他们的视域与论述侧重点难免存在某些差异,但他们在该设想上的根本立场与基本观点是一致的,因而学者们制造的“马恩对立论”并不成立。在新的时代背景下,正确审视马克思恩格斯跨越“卡夫丁峡谷”设想,不仅有利于加大对这一设想的认识与理解深度,而且有助于为驳斥各式各样的“马恩对立论”提供有益的思路与参考。

The idea of crossing the“Caudine Valley”is the common theoretical crystallization of Marx and Engels’analysis of the historical fate of Russian rural communes by using historical materialism.On this idea,Norman Levine and other scholars created the“Opposition between Marx and Engels”,which separated the integrity of Marxism,so it must be refuted theoretically.In fact,due to the different socio-historical backgrounds of Marx and Engels and their specific targets,there are inevitably some differences in their perspectives and the focus of their arguments,but their fundamental positions and basic views on the idea are consistent,so the“Opposition between Marx and Engels”created by scholars is not valid.Under the background of the new era,a correct examination of Marx and Engels’idea of crossing the“Caudine Valley”will not only help to enhance the understanding of this idea,but also help to provide useful ideas and references for refuting all kinds of“Opposition between Marx and Engels”.