期刊文献+

体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石后短期内行输尿管镜下气压弹道碎石术治疗的疗效分析

Analysis of the curative effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi treated by pneumatic lithotripsy under ureteroscope in short time
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗输尿管结石失败后2周行输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术(URSL)与单纯行URSL临床价值。方法选取2018年6月至2020年6月本院收治的122例输尿管结石患者作为研究对象,按照治疗方案不同分为研究组(n=60)与对照组(n=62)。研究组于体外冲击波碎石失败2周后行URSL,对照组单纯行URSL。比较两组结石情况、术中情况、术后情况和疼痛、生命质量改善情况。结果两组结石位置、结石大小、结石CT平均值、麻醉方式占比及术中置管成功率、结石净石率、出血及发热发生率、住院时间比较差异均无统计学意义;研究组手术时间明显长于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。手术前后,两组疼痛分级评分(VRS)、健康调查简表(SF-36)比较差异均无统计学意义;术后,两组VRS评分均低于术前,SF-36评分均高于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对输尿管结石行ESWL术后2周予以URSL治疗,可有效处理输尿管结石,其净石率高,术后并发症较低,住院时间较短,提高患者术后生命质量,缓解疼痛,疗效确切,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To compare the clinical value of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsis(URSL)2 weeks after the failure of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL)for ureteral calculi with URSL alone.Methods A total of 122 patients with ureteral calculi admitted to our hospital from June 2018 to June 2020 were selected as the research subjects,and they were divided into study group(n=60)and control group(n=62)according to different treatment regimens.The study group underwent URSL 2 weeks after the failure of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,and the control group underwent URSL.The stone situation,intraoperative situation,postoperative situation,pain and quality of life improvement were compared between the two groups.Results There were no significant differences in stone location,stone size,mean value of stone CT,proportion of anesthesia methods,success rate of intraoperative catheterization,stone free rate,incidence of bleeding and fever,and length of hospital stay between the two groups.The operation time in the study group was significantly longer than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before and after operation,there was no significant difference in verbal rating scale(VRS)score and the MOS item short from health survey(SF-36)score between the two groups;after operation,the VRS scores of the two groups were lower than those before operation,and the SF-36 scores were higher than those before operation,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion URSL treatment for ureteral calculi 2 weeks after ESWL can effectively treat ureteral calculi,with high stone free rate,low postoperative complications,short hospital stay,improve the quality of life of patients after surgery,relieve pain,the curative effect is exact,and it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
作者 张亮 吕忠 吴浩然 吴斌 ZHANG Liang;LYU Zhong;WU Haoran;WU Bin(Department of Urology,Wujin Hospital,Jiangsu University,Changzhou,Jiangsu,213002,China)
出处 《当代医学》 2023年第10期49-52,共4页 Contemporary Medicine
基金 江苏大学临床医学科技发展基金项目(JLY2021021)。
关键词 输尿管结石 输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术 体外冲击波碎石 Ureteral calculi Ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献85

  • 1P.Sooriakumaran,R.Kaba,H.O.Andrews,N.P.N.Buchholz.Evaluation of the mechanisms of damage to flexible ureteroscopes and suggestions for ureteroscope preservation[J].Asian Journal of Andrology,2005,7(4):433-438. 被引量:26
  • 2鞠文,杨军,李兵,陈朝晖,庞自力,范民,肖亚军,曾甫清,肖传国.输尿管结石ESWL失败后输尿管镜钬激光碎石术[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2006,21(2):106-107. 被引量:19
  • 3Parker BD, Frederick RW, Reilly TP,et al. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium : yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Urology, 2004,64 : 1102-1106.
  • 4梁丽莉,郭应禄,汤慧娣,石声华.ESWL 治疗输尿管结石失败原因分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1997,18(5):273-274. 被引量:200
  • 5YIN X, TANG Z, YU B, et al. Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy versus pneumatic lithotripsy for treatment of distal ureteral calculi: a meta-analysis[J]. J Endourol, 2013, 27(23): 408-414.
  • 6ITO H, KAWAHARA T, TERAO H, et al. Evaluation of preoperative mea-surement of stone surface area as a predictor of stone-free status after combined ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience[J]. J Endourol, 2013, 27(13): 715-721.
  • 7KNISPEL H H, KLAN R, HEICAPPELL R, et al. Pneumatic lithotripsy applied through deflected working channel of mini-ureteroscope: results in 143 patients[J]. J Endourol, 1998, 12(4): 513-515.
  • 8SOFER M, DENSTEDT J. Flexible ureteroscopy and lithotripsy with the hol-mium: YAG Laser[J]. Can J Urol, 2000, 7(12): 952-956.
  • 9VASSAR G J, CHAN K F, TEICHMAN J M, et al. Holmium: YAG lithotripsy: photothermal mechanism[J]. J Endourol, 1999, 13(8): 181-190.
  • 10FLORATOS D L, DE LA ROSETTE J J. Lasers in urology[J]. BJU Int, 1999, 84(47): 204-211.

共引文献273

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部