期刊文献+

AHP-FCE在本科毕业论文答辩成绩评定中的应用——以食品专业为例

The Application of AHP-FCE in Evaluating the Undergraduate Thesis Defense——Take Food Majors for Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本科毕业论文答辩是衡量毕业生专业知识、学术水平和实践技能的重要环节,也是正确评价毕业生综合素养的重要尺度。食品专业本科毕业答辩成绩评定过程中,采用层次分析法(AHP)根据答辩学生陈述表达熟练程度、论文质量和规范性、问题回答准确性和流畅性确定各指标权重,一致性指标C.I和修正后C.R进行检验。采用模糊综合评价法(FCE)依据评价等级建立隶属度矩阵,通过模糊综合评判,计算最终答辩成绩。经过对比分析,AHP-FCE评价明显优于平均值评价,答辩成绩分布符合河南科技大学应用工程学院本科生毕业设计(论文)文件要求。定性和定量相结合的AHP-FCE评价机制能够充分体现本科毕业论文答辩成绩评价的客观性和公正性,有利于全面提升人才培养的针对性和适应性。 The thesis defense is an important part to measure the professional knowledge,academic level and practical skills of graduates,and also an important measure to evaluate the comprehensive quality of graduates.In the process of evaluating the graduation defense of food majors,AHP was used to determine the weight of each index according to the proficiency of statement expression,the quality and standardization of the paper,the accuracy and fluency in answering questions,the consistency index C.I and corrected C.R were used for testing.FCE was used to establish the membership matrix according to the evaluation level,and the final defense score was calculated by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.AHP-FCE evaluation is obviously better than the average evaluation,and the defense score distribution meets requirements of undergraduate graduation project(thesis)documents of Applied Engineering College,Henan University of Science and Technology.AHP-FCE evaluation mechanism can fully reflect the objectivity and justice in the evaluation of the thesis defense,it is beneficial to comprehensively enhance the pertinence and adaptability of talent training.
作者 迟明梅 CHI Mingmei(Sanmenxia Polytechnic,Sanmenxia Henan 472000,China;Henan University of Science and Technology Sanmenxia Polytechnic,Sanmenxia Henan 472000,China)
出处 《食品与发酵科技》 CAS 2023年第4期161-165,共5页 Food and Fermentation Science & Technology
基金 河南省高等教育教学改革研究与实践项目(2021SJGLX740) 河南省教育科学规划一般课题(2023YB0572) 三门峡职业技术学院教学改革研究重点项目(SJG-2022-001)。
关键词 层次分析法 模糊综合评价法 本科毕业论文 成绩评定 AHP FCE undergraduate thesis achievement evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献42

共引文献136

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部