期刊文献+

γ-谷氨酰转移酶、大内皮素-1对急性冠脉综合征患者PCI术后支架内再狭窄的预测价值 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:回顾性分析γ-谷氨酰转移酶(γ-GT)、大内皮素-1对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠脉介入术(PCI)后支架内再狭窄(ISR)的预测价值。方法:选取2018-01-2022-10在本院心血管内科行冠脉造影(CAG)并行PCI的ACS患者451例,根据术后一年CAG复查结果将其分为ISR组(56例)和非ISR组(395例)。从电子病历收集入选者术前临床和实验检测资料及术后一年r-GT、大内皮素-1血浆水平进行组间比较后,用多因素Logistic回归模型筛选ISR独立影响因素,并绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价γ-GT、大内皮素-1对ISR的预测价值。结果:(1)与非ISR组相比,ISR组糖化血红蛋白(HbAlc)、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、血肌酐、D-二聚体(D-D)、γ-GT、大内皮素-1等的水平及吸烟史、心肌桥比例、分叉病变、支架≥2枚等的比例更高,eGFR水平和规律用药比例更低(P<0.05或P<0.01)。(2)多因素Logistic回归分析显示HbA1c、γ-GT、大内皮素-1、心肌桥、分叉病变和eGFR、规律用药是ISR的独立影响因素,前5项为独立危险因素。(3)ROC曲线分析显示γ-GT、大内皮素-1预测ISR的AUC分别为0.789、0.740;两者联合预测ISR的AUC为0.832,高于两者单独预测(Z=3.038、3.765,P<0.05)。结论:γ-GT和大内皮素-1水平与ACS患者PCI术后ISR发生有关,两者联合检测可明显提高PCI术后ISR的预测能力。
出处 《微循环学杂志》 2023年第3期36-38,45,共4页 Chinese Journal of Microcirculation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献75

  • 1Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3) : 267-315. DOI: 10. 1016/j. rec. 2015. 10. 009.
  • 2Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain : The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department [ J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243. DOI: 10. 1007/s12350-011-9484-7.
  • 3Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209. DOI: 10. ll61/CIRCIMAGING. 112. 980797.
  • 4Huhen E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in theemergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 61 (8): 880- 892. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2009. 02. 008.
  • 5Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/l-hour algorithm in the diagnosis ofmyocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-2. DOI: 10. 1016/j. annemergrned. 2015. 11. 013.
  • 6Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16) : 1211-1218. DOI: 10. 1001/archintemmed. 2012. 3698.
  • 7Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20) : 2569-2619. DOI: 10. 1093/eurheartj/ehs215.
  • 8Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score [J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425. DOI: 10. 1136/bmjopen-2013-O04425.
  • 9Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Iear P, et al. Comparing the predictive validity of three contemporary bleeding risk scores in acute coronary syndrome [J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2012, 1 (3): 222-231. DOI: 10. 1177/2048872612453924.
  • 10Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361 (11): 1045-1057. DOI: 10. 1056/ NEJMoa0904327.

共引文献577

同被引文献19

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部