我国工匠精神研究的可视化分析——基于CNKI双样本数据源的知识图谱绘制

Visual Analysis of the Study of Craftsman Spirit in China——Based on Knowledge Graph Drawing of CNKI Dual Sample Data Source

为直观呈现我国学术界有关工匠精神的研究现状,梳理工匠精神的意蕴,在中国知网(CNKI)中以“工匠精神”为主题词进行检索,限定年份为2015年至2020年,限定期刊来源为核心期刊和CSSCI,得到第一份样本,中位数以上高被引期刊为第二份样本,分别绘制作者、机构、关键词、时区和突显词科学知识图谱,以呈现主要研究力量分布及其合作关系,追踪研究的热点主题和探寻研究进程的发展流变。研究结果如下:从作者合作知识图谱看,样本一的作者合作关系较为密切,发文质量较高,样本二的作者合作关系相对稀薄,质量较低;从机构合作知识图谱看,样本一的合作关系更为紧密,主要研究力量是大学,样本二的合作关系较稀疏,主要研究力量是职业院校;从研究热点看,样本一和样本二共同关注了新时代、职业院校、高职学生、培育路径、工匠、大学生、创新等七大核心关键词,但样本二较样本一出现三个不同的研究趋势;从研究演进看,样本一和样本二的时间线图在时区演进上保持相对的一致性,但样本二的研究内容更为细化。

In order to directly present the current research status of craftsman spirit in Chinese academic circles and comb out the implication of craftsman spirit,the research objects are two samples with“craftsman spirit”as the main theme in CNKI.The limited years are from 2015 to 2020,and the limited journal sources are core journals and CSSCI.The first sample is obtained,and the highly cited journals are the second sample.The scientific knowledge graph of authors,institutions,keywords,time zones and salient words is drawn respectively to present the distribution of main research forces and their cooperation,track the hot topics of research and explore the development and evolution of the research process.The research results are as follows:Firstly,from the perspective of the author’s cooperative knowledge graph,the author’s cooperative relationship in sample 1 is relatively close,and the quality of the published documents is high,while the author’s cooperative relationship in sample 2 is relatively thin,and the quality is low.Secondly,from the perspective of the knowledge graph of institutional cooperation,the cooperation relationship of sample 1 is closer,and the main research force is universities,while the cooperation relationship of sample 2 is sparse,and the main research force is vocational colleges.Thirdly,from the perspective of research focus,sample 1 and sample 2 focus on the seven core keywords of the new era,vocational colleges,vocational students,cultivation path,craftsman,college students and innovation,but sample 2 and sample 1 have three different research trends.Fourthly,from the perspective of research evolution,the timeline of sample 1 and sample 2 remains relatively consistent in time zone evolution,but the research content of sample 2 is more detailed.