期刊文献+

基于幸福PERMA模式的护理干预在脊柱骨折脊髓损伤患者中的应用 被引量:3

Application of nursing intervention based on well-being PERMA model in patients with spinal fracture accompanying spinal cord injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨基于幸福PERMA模式的护理干预在脊柱骨折脊髓损伤患者中的应用效果。方法采用便利抽样法选取2018年1月—2019年12月在北京积水潭医院综合骨科接受治疗的116例脊柱骨折伴脊髓损伤患者为研究对象。采用随机数字表法将患者分为对照组和观察组,各58例。对照组接受常规护理干预,观察组接受基于幸福PERMA模式的护理干预。比较干预前和干预后(出院3个月)两组患者主观幸福感、日常生活能力、运动功能及生活质量得分的差异。结果干预前,两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后,观察组患者主观幸福感得分、运动功能得分、生活质量得分高于对照组,日常生活能力得分低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在脊柱骨折伴脊髓损伤患者中应用基于幸福PERMA模式的护理干预,可以提高患者的主观幸福感和生活质量,改善患者日常生活能力和运动功能。 Objective To explore the application effect of nursing interventions based on well-being PERMA model in patients with spinal fracture accompanying spinal cord injury.Methods Using the convenient sampling method,a total of 116 patients with spinal fracture accompanying spinal cord injury who received treatment in the Comprehensive Orthopedics Department of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2018 to December 2019 were selected as the research objects.The patients were divided into the control group and the observation group using the random number table method,with 58 cases in each group.The control group received routine nursing intervention,while the observation group received nursing intervention based on well-being PERMA model.The scores of subjective well-being,activity of daily living,motor function and quality of life were compared between the two groups before intervention and after intervention(3 months after discharge).Results Before intervention,there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).After the intervention,the scores of subjective well-being,motor function and quality of life in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,and the score of activity of daily living were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions Application of nursing intervention based on well-being PERMA model in patients with spinal fracture accompanying spinal cord injury can improve subjective well-being and quality of life of patients,and improve their activity of daily living and motor function.
作者 李雅 郑元元 郭子阳 刘昕怡 李安 Li Ya;Zheng Yuanyuan;Guo Ziyang;Liu Xinyi;Li An(Department of Orthopaedics,Beijing Jishuitan Hospital,Beijing 102206,China)
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2023年第21期2902-2907,共6页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 首都卫生发展科研专项项目(2018-1-2071)。
关键词 脊髓损伤 PERMA模式 主观幸福感 日常生活能力 运动功能 生活质量 Spinal cord injury PERMA model Subjective well-being Activity of daily living Motor function Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献96

  • 1曹瑞,孙红梅.PERMA——塞利格曼的幸福感理论新框架[J].天津市教科院学报,2014,26(2):10-12. 被引量:24
  • 2邵爱仙,黄丽华,胡斌春,蒋小英,邵乐文,徐红,沈丽娜,金爱云,冯志宪,姚蕴伍.根据病人日常生活自理能力分级计算护理工作量[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(1):36-39. 被引量:136
  • 3张荀芳,郑彩娥,蒋小毛.康复护理ADL量表简介[J].中国康复医学杂志,2004,19(6):471-472. 被引量:26
  • 4各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33020
  • 5于普林,吴雅凤,赵兵利,郑国珍,宋晓光,张培兰,何慧德.老年离退休职工生活质量调查分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,1996,15(6):370-371. 被引量:40
  • 6Ware JE. SF - 36 Health Survey. Marmual and Interpretation Guide. Boston. MA: The Health Institute, 1993 .
  • 7Gandek B, Ware JE Jr, Aaronson NK, et al. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF - 36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998 , 51 (11) : 1149 -1158.
  • 8Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF - 36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Elaidemiol, 1998, 51 (11): 903- 912.
  • 9Sanson - Fisher RW, Perkins JJ. Adaptation and validation of the SF- 36 Health Survey for use in Australia. J Clin Epidemiol,1998, 51 (11): 961-967.
  • 10Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr. The Swedish SF- 36 Health Survey - - I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden.Soc Sci Med. 1995, 41 (10): 349-358.

共引文献1020

同被引文献35

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部