期刊文献+

医疗机构药品临床综合评价的质量控制 被引量:1

Quality control of clinical comprehensive evaluation in medical institutions
原文传递
导出
摘要 国家卫生健康委员会已于2021年7月下发《药品临床综合评价管理指南(试行)》,文件为药品临床综合评价工作提供指导原则。虽然在指南中明确评价流程、内容及维度,强调证据评价和应用、证据信息及评价质量控制,但质量控制的详细内容与标准尚需探索。该文从文献综述、原始研究、经济性研究及调研访谈四个角度提出医疗机构药品综合评价运行的质量控制体系,希望能为医疗机构的药品临床综合评价应用提供参考。 The National Health Commission has issued the Guidelines for the Management of Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation(Trial)in July 2021 to provide guiding principles for the clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs.Although the evaluation process,content and dimension are clearly defined in the guide,and the evidence information and evaluation quality control for evidence evaluation and application are emphasized,the detailed content and standards of quality control still need to be explored.This paper proposed a quality control system for clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs in medical institutions from the perspectives of literature review,original research,economic research and investigation,hoping to provide references for the clinical application of drug comprehensive evaluation in medical institutions.
作者 董子洵 田夏 刘家伟 阮锦凤 林芳卉 李楠 韩晟 DONG Zixun;TIAN Xia;LIU Jiawei;RUAN Jinfeng;LIN Fanghui;LI Nan;HAN Sheng(Institude of Hospital Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430071,Hubei Province,China;International Research Center of Medial Management,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China;The Clinical Epidemiology Research Center of Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing 100191,China)
出处 《世界临床药物》 CAS 2023年第5期416-423,共8页 World Clinical Drug
关键词 药品临床综合评价 医疗机构 质量控制 clinical comprehensive evaluation medical institution quality control
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献59

  • 1周长江,葛卫红,方芸.关于医院新药引进管理程序的探讨[J].中国药事,2006,20(9):526-527. 被引量:6
  • 2文进,李幼平.Meta分析中效应尺度指标的选择[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(8):606-613. 被引量:129
  • 3Jadad AR. Randomised controlled trials, A user's guide.[2007-01-26]http://www.cgmh.org.tw/intr/intr5/c6700/OBGYN/F/Randomized%20tial/chapter I .html.
  • 4Chalmers TC, Celano P, Sacks HS, et al. Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. N Engl J Med, 1983, 309:1359-1361.
  • 5Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, et al. Empirical evidence of bias:dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA, 1995, 273: 408-412.
  • 6Schulz KF. Subverting randomization in controlled trials. JAMA,1995, 274: 1456-1458.
  • 7Pildal J, Chan AW, Hrebjartsson A, et al. Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study. BM./, 2005, 330: 1049.
  • 8Moher D, Fortin P, Jadad AR, et al. Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. Lancet, 1996, 347:363-366.
  • 9Grimes DA,Schulz KF.An overview of clinical research:the lay of the land[J].Lancet,2002,359(9300):57-61.
  • 10Egger M,Smith GD,Altman DG.Systematic reviews in health care.Meta-analysis in context[M].2nd ed.London:BMJ Publishing Group,BMA House,Tavistock Square,WC1H 9JR,2001.

共引文献1645

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部