期刊文献+

4种衰弱识别工具在老年癌症患者中的应用比较 被引量:1

Comparison of four frailty screening tools in elderly cancer patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较4种衰弱工具对老年癌症患者衰弱风险的筛查能力,为临床衰弱筛查工具的选择提供参考。方法采用目的抽样法,选取308例住院老年癌症患者为研究对象,采用老年-八项问卷、弱势老年人调查-13问卷、简明老年人综合评估问卷、衰弱表型和老年综合评估工具进行衰弱评价。以老年综合评估结果为衰弱诊断金标准,通过Bayes判别分析和受试者工作特征曲线分析比较4种筛查工具筛查老年癌症患者衰弱风险的能力。结果老年癌症患者衰弱的发病率为46.10%~70.45%。老年-八项问卷、弱势老年人调查-13问卷、简明老年人综合评估问卷、衰弱表型与老年综合评估一致性比较的Kappa值分别是0.599、0.813、0.711和0.928(均P<0.05);对老年癌症患者衰弱风险预测的交叉验证准确性分别为80.5%、90.6%、85.7%和96.4%;受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.867、0.943、0.853和0.976。结论4种工具筛查老年癌症患者衰弱风险的能力由高到低分别为衰弱表型、弱势老年人调查-13问卷、简明老年人综合评估问卷、老年-八项问卷。鉴于工具的筛查性能和临床应用便捷度,弱势老年人调查-13问卷可广泛应用于老年癌症患者的衰弱筛查。 Objective To compare the efficacy of 4 frailty screening tools in elderly cancer patients,and provide a basis for selection of appropriate frailty screening tools in clinical settings.Methods A total of 308 hospitalized elderly cancer patients were selected by purposive sampling method,and were assessed for frailty by using the Geriatric 8,the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13,the Abbreviated Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment,the Frailty Phenotype and the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment,respectively.With the results of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment being used as the gold standard for frailty diagnosis,the results of 4 screening tools were compared against the gold standard by running Bayes discriminant analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristic(ROC)analysis,in a bid to determine the frailty screening efficacy of the tools in elderly cancer patients.Results The prevalence of frailty in elderly cancer patients ranged from 46.10%to 70.45%.The consistency of frailty screening results yielded from the Ge-riatric 8,Vulnerable Elders Survey-13,Abbreviated Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment,and Frailty Phenotype,respectively against the frailty results of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment generated a Kappa value of 0.599,0.813,0.711 and 0.928,respectively(all P<0.05).Cross validation accuracy for predicting frailty risk by the 4 tools was 80.5%,90.6%,85.7%and 96.4%,respectively.The area under the ROC curve was 0.867,0.943,0.853 and 0.976,respectively.Conclusion The Frailty Phenotype has the highest frailty screening efficacy,followed by the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13,the Abbreviated Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment,and the Geriatric 8 in descending order.Courtesy of excellent screening efficacy and easiness to use in clinical settings,the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 is recommended for frailty screening in elderly cancer patients.
作者 张琴 於茗 王慧 唐荣荣 肖明兵 严海鸥 Zhang Qin;Yu Ming;Wang Hui;Tang Rongrong;Xiao Mingbing;Yan Haiou(Nursing Research Institute,Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University,Nantong 226001,China)
出处 《护理学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第15期92-96,共5页 Journal of Nursing Science
基金 江苏省自然科学基金面上项目(BK20211105) 南通市2020社会民生科技面上公众健康项目(MS12020013)。
关键词 老年人 癌症 衰弱 衰弱筛查 老年综合评估 老年护理 older adults cancer frailty frailty screening comprehensive geriatric assessment elder care
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献69

  • 1汪向东,沈其杰.深圳移居者心理健康水平及有关因素的初步研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1988,2(5):193-197. 被引量:33
  • 2肖水源,杨德森.社会支持对身心健康的影响[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1987,1(4):183-187. 被引量:872
  • 3肖水源.《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用[J].临床精神医学杂志,1994,4(2):98-100. 被引量:4037
  • 4陈卫中,潘晓平,倪宗瓒.logistic回归模型在ROC分析中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2007,24(1):22-24. 被引量:54
  • 5新华网.我国人群中消化系统恶性肿瘤发病位居第一[EB/OL]. [2011 - 10 — 15]. http://news, xinhuanet. com/health/ 2008 - 10/30/ content_10277270. htm.
  • 6Portenoy R,Itri L. Cancer - related fatigue: Guidelines for evaluation and management[J]. Oncologist,1999,4( 1) :1 - 10.
  • 7Okuyama T, Akechi T,Kugaya A,et al. Development and validation of the cancer fatigue scale: A brief,three - dimensional,self-rating scale for assessment of fatigue in cancer patients[J]. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management,2000,19:5 - 14.
  • 8Patrick C,Stone OM. Cancer - related fatigue[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2008,44(8):1097 - 1104.
  • 9张凤玲.癌症疲乏量表(CFS)的跨文化调适及初步应用[EB/OL]. [2011 - 10 - 15]. http://so. med. wanfangdata. com. cn/ViewHTML/ DegreePaper_Y1490287. aspx/.
  • 10Shun SC. Beck SL,Pett MA^et al. Psychometric testing of three Chinese fatigue instruments in Taiwan[J]. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management,2006,32(2) : 155 - 167.

共引文献4129

同被引文献15

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部