不同抗高血压药物治疗原发性高血压的效果

Effect of Different Antihypertensive Drugs in Treating Essential Hypertension

目的 探讨对原发性高血压患者采用不同抗高血压药物治疗的效果。方法 选取2020年3月至2021年11月大连医科大学附属第二医院收治的90例原发性高血压患者作为研究对象,依据抗高血压药物不同分为对照组与观察组,每组45例。对照组予以氯沙坦钾治疗,观察组接受马来酸左旋氨氯地平治疗,比较两组治疗有效率、成本-效果以及用药满意度。结果 观察组与对照组治疗有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组的成本-效果较对照组更优(P<0.05);观察组用药满意度较对照组更高(P<0.05)。结论 马来酸左旋氨氯地平较氯沙坦钾治疗原发性高血压的成本-效果更优,且获得较高的用药满意度,可将用药总体效率显著提升。

Objective To explore the effect of different antihypertensive drugs on patients with essential hypertension.Methods A total of 90 patients with essential hypertension admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from March 2020 to November 2021 were selected as the study objects,and divided into control group and observation group according to different antihypertensive drugs,with 45 cases in each group.The control group was treated with losartan potassium,and the observation group was treated with levamlodipine maleate.The treatment efficiency,cost-effectiveness and medication satisfaction of the two groups were compared.Results There was no significant difference between the observation group and the control group(P>0.05).The cost-effectiveness of observation group was better than that of control group(P<0.05).The satisfaction of medication in observation group was higher than that in control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Levamlodipine maleate has better cost-effectiveness than losartan potassium in the treatment of essential hypertension,and higher medication satisfaction can be obtained,which can significantly improve the overall efficiency of medication.