检察一体视域下知识产权检察履职模式比较研究

Comparative study on the performance mode of intellectual property prosecution from the perspective of procuratorial integration

在最高人民检察院部署开展的知识产权检察职能集中统一履行试点工作中,各地结合本地需求、案件数量、现有机构设置等实际情况,主要创建了三种集中统一履职模式,即设立专门机构的上海模式、指定专属管辖的福州模式以及建设知识产权办公室和专业团队人才库的重庆模式。为实现改革目的,应当在同时考虑内部一体和上下一体、办案和人才培养、内部挖潜和外部借力、立足当下和兼顾长远的情况下,实现案件办理、人员管理、对外协调的省级统筹,保障知识产权检察的集中统一履职效果。

In the pilot work of centralized and unified performance of the intellectual property prosecution deployed by the Supreme People’s Procuratorate,three centralized and unified performance models have been mainly created based on local needs,the number of cases and the existing institutional settings.The Shanghai model of setting specialized institutions,the Fuzhou model of designating exclusive jurisdiction,and the Chongqing model of building intellectual property offices and talent pools of professional team.In order to achieve the purpose of reform,it is necessary to realize the provincial-level overall planning of case handling,personnel management and external coordination while simultaneously considering internal integration and top-down integration,case handling and personnel training,internal potential tapping and external leverage,and taking into account the current situation and long-term considerations,to guarantee the effect of centralized and unified performance of intellectual property prosecution.