期刊文献+

多部门杠杆波动与系统性金融风险

Leverage Volatility in Multiple Sectors and Systemic Financial Risk
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于SV-TVP-VAR模型,对不同微观部门杠杆波动与系统性金融风险各方面的关系进行时变分析。研究发现:(1)不同部门的杠杆波动在短期会滋生系统性金融风险,而长期则会对风险起到缓释作用;(2)系统性金融风险的变动会导致相应领域杠杆水平发生调整,不同部门间存在显著差异;(3)政府重心不同的“去杠杆”举措,会造成风险即期的异质性变动,但风险水平会逐渐回落。因而,当前需灵活制定不同部门的杠杆调控政策,依托宏观审慎监管体系实现结构性“稳杠杆”与防范系统性金融风险的动态平衡。 Based on SV-TVP-VAR model,combined with different lag periods and three rounds of “deleveraging” measures of the government,this paper analyzes a temporal change in the relationship between leverage fluctuations in different micro sectors and systemic financial risks.The study found the following results.Firstly,leverage fluctuations in different sectors will lead to systemic financial risks in the short term,but they will mitigate risks in the long term.Secondly,The change of systemic financial risk will lead to the adjustment of leverage level in corresponding fields,and there are significant differences between different departments.Thirdly,The government pays attention to different “deleveraging” measures,which will cause immediate heterogeneous changes in risk,but the risk level will gradually decline.In a word,it is important to flexibly formulate leverage control policies for different departments,and rely on the macro-prudential supervision system to achieve a dynamic balance between structural “stabilizing leverage” and preventing systemic financial risks.
作者 郑智勇 何剑 张梦婷 王心怡 ZHENG Zhiyong;HE Jian;ZHANG Mengting;WANG Xinyi(School of Economics,Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing,211815;Institute of Statistics and Data Science,Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics,Urumqi,830012;School of Finance,Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing,211815;School of Economics and Management,Shihezi University,Shihezi,832000)
出处 《中国经济问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2023年第3期151-165,共15页 China Economic Studies
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(7216030084) 国家自然科学基金项目(71863031) 新疆维吾尔自治区研究生科研创新项目(XJ2021G093)。
关键词 微观部门 差异性杠杆 风险构成 micro sectors differential leverage risk composition
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献240

  • 1范小云,王道平,方意.我国金融机构的系统性风险贡献测度与监管——基于边际风险贡献与杠杆率的研究[J].南开经济研究,2011(4):3-20. 被引量:155
  • 2方意,赵胜民,王道平.我国金融机构系统性风险测度——基于DGC-GARCH模型的研究[J].金融监管研究,2012(11):26-42. 被引量:55
  • 3程希明,蒋学雷,陈敏,吴国富.中国股市板块羊群效应的实证研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(12):34-38. 被引量:24
  • 4Ando A, Modigliani F. The "Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate Implications and Tests[J]. The American Economic Review, 1963:55-84.
  • 5Anundsen A K., Jansen E S. Self-reinforcing Effects between Housing Prices and Credit[J]. Journal of Housing E- conomics, 2013, 22 (3): 192-212.
  • 6Bernanke B S, Gertler M. Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission[J]. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, 9 (4): 27-48.
  • 7Binswanger M. Stock Markets, Speculative Bubbles and Economic Growth: New Dimensions in the Co-evolution of Real and Financial Markets[M]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1999.
  • 8Calza A, Manrique M, Sousa J. Credit in the Euro Area: An Empirical Investigation Using Aggregate Data[J]. TheQuarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2006, 46 (2) : 211-226.
  • 9Campbell J Y, Cocco J F. How do House Prices Affect Consumption? Evidence from Micro Data[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2007, 54 (3): 591-621.
  • 10Case K E, Quigley J M, Shiller R J. Comparing Wealth Effects: The Stock Market Versus the Housing Market [J]. Advances in Macroeconomics, 2005, 5 (1).

共引文献1158

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部