期刊文献+

不同数据库中^(56)Fe评价截面对屏蔽计算影响研究

Research on the influence of ^(56)Fe evaluation cross section of different databases on shielding calculation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了对各类评价库中^(56)Fe截面在屏蔽计算方面的适用性和精确度进行评估,选用FE DIA100 R150代表性基准题对不同评价库及同一评价库不同版本中^(56)Fe截面数据质量进行评价;并基于CENDL-3.2评价库,开展了对^(56)Fe的敏感性分析工作,主要对其关键反应道截面在屏蔽计算方面的影响进行研究。研究结果表明:(1)由于^(56)Fe的弹性散射截面和非弹性散射截面数据准确度的缺失,导致1.20~1.70 MeV、10.00~17.00 MeV等能区,各类评价库计算值与实验测量值差异均较大;(2)^(56)Fe中的(n,n)和(n,n′)d反应截面对屏蔽计算影响最为敏感;(3)CENDL-3.2中^(56)Fe(n,n)反应截面值在0.01~0.10 MeV能区较真实值截面值偏高。 ^(56)Fe evaluation cross sections are still being updated at home and abroad.In order to evaluate the applicability and accuracy of ^(56)Fe cross sections in various evaluation libraries and different versions of the same evaluation library in shielding calculation,this paper selects the FE DIA100 R150 benchmark with the evaluation the cross-section data quality of ^(56)Fe in different evaluation libraries.And based on the CENDL-3.2 evaluation library,the sensitivity analysis of ^(56)Fe stable isotopes was carried out,and the influence of key reaction channel sections of ^(56)Fe on shielding calculation was studied.Some main conclusions are drawn as follows.1)Due to the lack of accuracy of the elastic scattering cross section and inelastic scattering cross section of ^(56)Fe,there are large differences between the calculated values of various evaluation libraries and the experimental measurements in the energy regions of 1.20-1.70 MeV and 10.00-17.00 MeV.2)The(n,n)and(n,n′)d reaction cross-sections in ^(56)Fe are the most sensitive factors to the influence of shielding calculations.3)In CENDL-3.2,the cross section value of ^(56)Fe(n,n)is higher than the real value in the energy region of 0.01-0.10 MeV.
作者 池晓淼 韩毅 陈法国 马翔宇 沈华亚 CHI Xiaomiao;HAN Yi;CHEN Faguo;MA Xiangyu;SHEN Huaya(China Institute for Radiation Protection,Taiyuan 030006)
出处 《辐射防护》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第S01期1-7,共7页 Radiation Protection
基金 国防基础研究计划(批准号:JCKY2020201C016) 山西省基础研究计划基金(批准号:20210302124178)。
关键词 ^(56)Fe 屏蔽计算 评价核数据库 敏感性分析 ^(56)Fe shielding calculations evaluation nuclear database sensitivity analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献8

  • 1柴晓明,王侃,余纲林.温度相关核截面数据库在MCNP计算中的必要性研究[J].原子核物理评论,2006,23(2):111-114. 被引量:7
  • 2MacFarlane R E, Muir D W. The N JOY Nuclear Data Processing System[R]. Version 91. Los Alamos Labora tory report LA-12740-M. October 1994.
  • 3Cross Section Evaluation Working Group. ENDF-102 Data Formats and Procedures for the Evaluated Nuclear Data File ENDF-6[M]. National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, July 2000.
  • 4刘延进,梁祺昌,沈林兴等.核数据格式手册[M].中国核数据中心.
  • 5Judith F. Briesmeister, Editor. MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-particle Transport Code. Version 4B[M]. Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA- 12625-M.
  • 6Peeters T T J M, Hogenbiik A. Jezebel Benchmark Calculations Performed with MCNP4A[R]. JEF/DOC- 498. November 1994.
  • 7Toshihiro Yamamoto, Yoshinori Miyoshi, Tsukasa Kikuchi, et al. Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiment on 10% Enriched Uranyl Nitrate Solution Using a 28-cm-Thickness Slab Core[J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2002, 39(7): 789-799.
  • 8Jung-Do Kim, Chcong-Sup Gil. Testing of the JEF-2.2 and ENDF/B-V1.2 through MCNP Analysis of BWR- Simulated Critical Experiments[C]. The Meetings of the JEP and EFF projects, 15th to 16th Jan. 1996, Paris.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部