期刊文献+

八年级学生数学高阶思维能力的测评研究--基于Z市28153名学生的分析

Assessment Research on the Mathematical Higher-order Thinking Skills of Eighth-grade Students:Analysis Based on 28153 Eighth-grade Students in City Z
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于布鲁姆的认知分类学和PISA测评框架,结合专家评定法,构建数学能力、认知水平和问题情境的三维数学高阶思维能力测评框架,依据测评框架开发相应的测试题,并对Z市11个区县的28153名八年级学生数学高阶思维能力进行测评。结果表明:数学能力维度问题解决得分最低,认知水平维度评价得分最低,问题情境维度不同情境下高阶思维表现无显著差异;不同学业水平学生的数学高阶思维能力存在显著差异,B水平与A水平学生间差异显著且高于D水平与C水平学生间差异;女生的数学高阶思维能力比男生略高,但不存在显著差异。 Based on Bloom′s taxonomy and PISA′s assessment framework,combined with the expert assessment method,this study has established a three-dimensional assessment framework of mathematical ability,cognitive level and problem-solving context,and then developed corresponding tests to conduct on 28153 eighth-grade students in 11 districts and counties of City Z.The result shows that:(1)In the mathematical ability dimension,the score for problem-solving is the lowest,while in the cognitive level dimension,the score for evaluation is the lowest.There is no significant difference in high-order thinking performance in different contexts;(2)There are significant differences in higher-order mathematical thinking abilities among students in different academic levels,with the difference between B and A levels being significantly higher than the difference between D and C levels;(3)Girls have slightly higher mathematical higher-order thinking abilities than boys,but there is no significant difference.
作者 白永潇 綦春霞 BAI Yongxiao;QI Chunxia(Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education,Beijing Institute of Education,Beijing 100044,China;Faculty of Education,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处 《北京教育学院学报》 2023年第4期48-54,共7页 Journal of Beijing Institute of Education
基金 北京教育学院重点关注课题“高阶思维视域下数学单元作业设计与实施的研究”(ZDGZ2021-04)。
关键词 数学高阶思维能力 八年级学生 初中数学 mathematics higher-order thinking skills eighth-grade students junior middle school′s mathematics
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献108

  • 1钟志贤.如何发展学习者高阶思维能力?[J].远程教育杂志,2005,23(4):78-78. 被引量:159
  • 2李士铸.PME:数学教育心理[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001.175-198.
  • 3Bayles E E.The Theory and Practice of Teaching[M].New York:Harper & Brothers,1950.
  • 4Bloom B S.Taxonomy of Educational Objectives:The Classification of Educational Goals:Handbook I,Cognitive Domain[M].New York:Longmans,Green,1956.
  • 5Fan L.In-service Training in Alternative Assessment with Singapore Mathematics Teachers[J].The Mathematics Educator,2002,6(2):77-94.
  • 6Fan L,Zhu Y.How Have Chinese Students Performed in Mathematics? A Perspective from Large-scale International Mathematics Comparisons[A].In:Fan L,Wong N Y,Cai J,et al.How Chinese Learn Mathematics:Perspectives from Insiders (Chapter 1)[C].Singapore:World Scientific,2004.
  • 7Fan Lianghuo.Making Alternative Assessment an Integral Part of Instructional Practice[A].In:Lee P Y.Teaching Secondary School Mathematics:A resource book[C].Singapore:McGraw Hill,2006.
  • 8Hatfield M M,Edwards N T,Bitter G G.Mathematics Methods for Elementary and Middle School Teachers[J].Boston,MA:Allyn and Bacon,1997.
  • 9Ministry of Education (2001).Project Work to be Included for University Admission in 2005.Press Release (20 June),Singapore:Author.Available Internet http://www,moe.gov,sg/press/2001/pr20062001.htm (Retrieved 30 December,2005)
  • 10Ministry of Education (2005).Mathematics Syllabus.Singapore:Author.

共引文献1101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部