期刊文献+

默认意义的历时演变:语用-认知融合视角 被引量:4

Diachronic Change of Default Meaning:An Integrative Perspective of Pragmatics and Cognition
原文传递
导出
摘要 默认意义是当今后格赖斯语用学研究的热点。本研究尝试基于历史语用学和认知语法的最新成果提出一个语用-认知融合模式,并在此基础上借助历时语料库探索默认意义的演变动因和规律。默认意义的历时演变主要由转喻、隐喻和隐转喻三种认知动因促成;它从例型意义经固化演变而来,然后又经规约化最终演变为新词义。本研究打破了(后)格赖斯语用学基于语用原则的推导模式的传统,证明了不同的意义很难严格区分,默认意义的生成是从个体语境化向集体规约化的历时演变过程。 Default meaning is the research focus in post-Gricean pragmatics.Based on historical pragmatics and cognitive grammar,this paper attempts to provide an integrative model of pragmatics and cognition for the exploration of cognitive motivations and diachronic change of default meaning.Metonymy,metaphor and metaphtonymy contribute to diachronic change of default meaning.Default meaning changes from utterance-token meaning through entrenchment,and finally changes into a new word meaning through conventionalization.Breaking the(post-)Gricean tradition of the principle-based inferential model,this study proves that different types of meaing cannot be strictly divided,and the generation of default meaning is a process of diachronic change from individual contextualization to collective conventionalization.
作者 张延飞 梁妮娜 ZHANG Yanfei;LIANG Nina
出处 《外语与外语教学》 北大核心 2023年第3期22-32,145,146,共13页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基金 山东大学齐鲁青年学者项目的阶段性研究成果。
关键词 默认意义 历时演变 语用 认知 default meaning diachronic change pragmatics cognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献57

  • 1白解红.语境与意义[J].外语与外语教学,2000(4):21-24. 被引量:85
  • 2王全智,赵卫红.意义关系再探讨[J].外语学刊,2001(1):64-72. 被引量:5
  • 3Agerri, R. & Korta, K. Pragmatically Determined Aspects of Utterance Meaning: Explicature, Impliciture, and Implicature. Report No. ILCLI-01-LIC-10, June ,2001.
  • 4Atlas,J. Logic,Meaning and Conversation[ M ]. Oxford:OUP,2005.
  • 5Bach, K. Default Reasoning: Jumping to Conclusions and Knowing When to Think Twice [ J ]. Paciftc Philosophical Ouarterly. 1984 (65).
  • 6Bach, K. Semantic Slack : What is Said and More [ A ]. In Tsohatzidis, S. L. ( ed. ) Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives [ C ]. London : Routledge, 1994.
  • 7Bach, K. The Semantics-pragmatics Distinction : What It is and Why It Matters [ J ]. Linguistiche Berichte , 1997 ( 8 ).
  • 8Bach, K. Regressions in' Pragmatics ( and Semantics) [ A ]. In Burton- Roberts, N. ( ed. ) Pragmatics [ C ]. Basingstoke: Palgrave ,2007.
  • 9Carston, R. Thoughts and Utterances:The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication [ M ]. Oxford : Blackwel1,2002.
  • 10Garrett, M. & Harnish, M. Experimental Pragmatics : Testing for Implicitures[ J]. Pragmatics and Cognition ,2007 ( 15 ).

共引文献47

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部