期刊文献+

检举他人犯罪型重大立功的认定

Identification of Major Meritorious Services of Reporting Others of Crimes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 检举他人犯罪型立功是立功的常见形式。“所检举揭发的犯罪可能判处无期徒刑以上刑罚或者系重大犯罪”是认定重大立功的关键条件,但标准并不明晰。若被检举的犯罪未判决,“可能判处无期徒刑以上刑罚”不是指法定刑、量刑起点包括无期徒刑,而是指基准刑为无期徒刑或死刑。若被检举的犯罪已判决,一般以宣告刑为判断重大立功的主要依据,但法定从轻、减轻量刑情节影响量刑的除外。结合量刑规范化的相关规定,将“可能判处无期徒刑以上刑罚”解释为基准刑高于有期徒刑十五年,或者基准刑相当于有期徒刑二十六年,可以较好地解决部分重大立功的认定问题,有一定的可取性。 It is a common form of meritorious service to report others'crimes."The crime reported may be sentenced to life imprisonment or more or is a major crime",which is the key condition to identify major meritorious service,but the standard is not clear.If the indicted crime is pending,it may be sentenced to life imprisonment or more,not the starting point of sentencing,but the benchmark penalty is life imprisonment or death penalty.If the indicted crime has been decided,the declaration of punishment is generally the main basis for judging major meritorious service,except that the circumstances of statutory leniency and mitigation affect the sentencing.In combination with the relevant provisions of the standardization of sentencing,it is advisable to interpret the"possible punishment of life imprisonment or more"as the benchmark punishment higher than 15 years of fixed-term imprisonment,or the benchmark punishment equivalent to 26 years of fixed-term imprisonment.Through a number of specific charges to test,this method can better solve the identification of some major meritorious deeds.
作者 王登辉 WANG Deng-hui
出处 《江苏警官学院学报》 2023年第4期19-27,共9页 Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute
基金 第64批面上资助西部地区博士后人才资助计划课题(43XB3785XB) 西南政法大学2021年度校级青年项目“中国追诉时效制度研究”(2021XZNDQN-03)。
关键词 立功 重大立功 重大犯罪 检举他人犯罪 基准刑 meritorious services major meritorious services major crimes report others of crimes benchmark penalty
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献7

共引文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部