摘要
现实世界中的论辩必然发生在某种社会文化背景和动态变化的语境之下,其中涉及特定的社会规范和社会价值。对于实践推理决策而言,参与者之间的意见分歧往往不仅在于常识和信念,更在于对社会价值的不同优先排序。本文结合考虑语境的形式论辩理论,讨论如何将本土社会价值融入人工智能论辩系统,使得持有不同价值观的参与者之间能够建立有意义的共识。在对论证实例进行分析的基础上,可以将相关建模方法扩展到基于价值的实践推理应用中,探索如何结合形式论辩、广义论证理论等跨学科研究成果,评估考虑社会价值的实践推理论证。
Real-world agumentatio takes place within specife social and culhual contexts,inwolving social norms and values.In the realm of puactical reasoning and decision-making,participants'disagreements often stem not only fom differences in beliefs and comon knowledge but also fom distinct prionity orderings over social values.This article coumbines contextualized formal argumentation theory to explore how local social values can be incorponated into AI augumentation systems to foster consensus among par-ticipants with diverse value prionities.Through the analysis of argumentation cases,the proposed modeling approach can be extended to realize value-based practical reasoning,as well as investigate the integation of formal agumentation theary and the Generalized Argumentahion Theory to evaluate arguments for practical reasoning with comsideation of noums and values.
出处
《逻辑学研究》
2023年第4期40-54,共15页
Studies in Logic
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“汉译逻辑术语本土化与中国逻辑学话语体系建设研究”(21&ZD065)。