期刊文献+

自酸蚀与磷酸酸蚀在儿童恒磨牙窝沟封闭术中的效果比较

Comparison of effects of self-etching and phosphoric acid etching in pit and fissure sealing of permanent molars in children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较自酸蚀与磷酸酸蚀在儿童恒磨牙窝沟封闭术中的效果。方法:选取2020年9月至2022年9月于该院行第一恒磨牙窝沟封闭术的62名预防恒磨牙龋坏儿童进行前瞻性研究,按照随机数字表法分为对照组和研究组各31名。两组均行恒磨牙窝沟封闭术,对照组采用传统磷酸酸蚀窝沟封闭,研究组采用自酸蚀窝沟封闭,比较两组封闭剂保存率、术后12个月龋齿率、舒适度评分、术后牙周指标[牙龈指数(GI)、龈沟出血指数(SBI)]水平和术后疼痛程度[修订版WongBaker面部表情疼痛评估法(FPS-R)]评分。结果:研究组封闭剂保存率为96.08%(49/51),高于对照组的78.85%(41/52),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组术后12个月龋齿率为1.96%(1/51),低于对照组的19.23%(10/52),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组舒适度评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后12个月,两组SBI、GI和FPS-R评分均低于术后6个月,且研究组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:自酸蚀窝沟封闭应用于儿童恒磨牙窝沟封闭术可提高封闭剂保存率和舒适度评分,降低龋齿率、术后牙周指标水平和疼痛程度评分,效果优于磷酸酸蚀窝沟封闭。 Objective:To compare application effects of self-etching and phosphoric acid etching in pit and fissure sealing of permanent molars in children.Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 62 children with permanent molar caries who underwent pit and fissure sealing of the first permanent molar in this hospital from September 2020 to September 2022.According to the random number table method,they were divided into control group and study group,31 cases in each group.Both groups underwent pit and fissure sealing of permanent molars.The control group was treated with traditional phosphoric acid etching pit and fissure sealing,while the study group was treated with self-etching pit and fissure sealing.The sealant preservation rate,the dental caries rate at 12 months after the operation,the comfort score,the postoperative periodontal index levels[gingival index(GI),sulcus bleeding index(SBI)],and the postoperative pain degree[revised Wong Baker facial expression pain assessment(FPS-R)]score were compared between the two groups.Results:The sealant preservation rate of the study group was 96.08%(49/51),which was higher than 78.85%(41/52)of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The caries rate of the study group 12 months after the operation was 1.96%(1/51),which was lower than that of the control group(19.23%,10/52),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The comfort score of the study group was higher than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).12 months after the operation,the scores of SBI,GI and FPS-R in the two groups were lower than those 6 months after the operation,those in the study group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:The self-etching pit and fissure sealing in the children’s permanent molar pit and fissure sealing can improve the sealant preservation rate and the comfort scores,and reduce the dental caries rate,the postoperative periodontal index levels and the pain scores.Moreover,it is superior to phosphoric acid etching pit and fissure sealing.
作者 蔡锦萍 钟菊招 CAI Jinping;ZHONG Juzhao(Department of Stomatology of Jiangtou Street Community Health Service Center of Huli District,of Xiamen City,Xiamen 361000 Fujian,China)
出处 《中国民康医学》 2023年第16期83-86,共4页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 自酸蚀 磷酸酸蚀 儿童 恒磨牙 窝沟封闭术 龋齿 牙周 Self-etching Phosphoric acid etching Children Permanent molar Pit and fissure sealing Dental caries Periodontal
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献88

  • 1韩夏.自酸蚀黏结剂结合流动复合体窝沟封闭中的临床疗效观察[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(18):81-81. 被引量:1
  • 2彭思敏,赵玮,林家成,凌均棨.自酸蚀黏结剂对恒牙窝沟封闭的疗效评价[J].上海口腔医学,2006,15(6):571-574. 被引量:19
  • 3李彩,郝玉庆,周学东.我国窝沟封闭防龋效果的循征医学分析[J].口腔医学研究,2007,23(5):575-577. 被引量:33
  • 4Cehreli ZC, Gungor HC. Quantitative microleakage evaluation of fissure sealants applied with or without a bonding agent: Results after four-year water storage in vitro[J]. J Adhes Dent., 2008, 10 ( 5 ) : 379-384.
  • 5Kwon HB, Park KT. SEM and microleakage evaluation of 3 flowable composites as sealants without using bonding agents [J]. Pediatr Dent, 2006, 28(1): 48-53.
  • 6Leskinen K, Salo S, Suni J, et al. Comparison of dental health in sealed and non-sealed first permanent molars: 7 years follow-up in practice-based dentistry [J]. J Dent, 2008, 36(1): 27-32.
  • 7Beauchamp J, Caufield PW, Carall J, et al. Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit and fissure sealants [J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2008, 139(3): 257-268.
  • 8Ansari G, Oloomi K, Eslami B. Microleakage assessment of pit and fissure sealant with and without the use of pumice prophylaxis [J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2004, 14(4): 272-278.
  • 9Duangthip D, Lussi A. Effects of application techniques and fissure types on the in vitro performance of two fissure sealants [J]. Am J Dent, 2004, 17(2): 137-142.
  • 10Seemann R, Bizhang M, Kluck I, et al. A novel in vitro microbial-based model for studying caries formation development and initial testing [J]. Caries Res, 2005, 39(3): 185-190.

共引文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部