竞合形态下“掩隐罪”与“帮信罪”适用辨析

Analysis of the Application of the Crime of Covering or Concealing Criminal Gains and Criminal Benefits and the Crime of Aiding Information Network Crime

考察司法实践中的裁判逻辑,可发现帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪与利用网络技术进行的传统犯罪之间界分、处断的司法适用现状较为混乱,这一现象在同掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得、犯罪所得收益罪产生竞合时体现尤甚。应当明确两罪名之间为想象竞合关系,而非法条竞合关系。当行为人客观上实施了出租、出售银行卡,实施转移资金等行为,主观上对于上游的犯罪活动以及转移支付的资金性质呈明知态度时,同时触犯两罪名,此时应当以“择一重”为原则论处,即根据具体案情选择适用宣告刑较重的罪名。

Examining the judicial logic in judicial practice,it can be found that the current judicial application of the distinction and punishment between the aiding information network crimes and traditional crimes committed using network technology is relatively chaotic.It is particularly evident when it coincides with the crime of covering up or concealing the llegal gains.It should be clarified that the relationship between the two charges is imaginative coincidence rather than law coincidence.When the perpetrator objectively commits acts such as renting,selling bank cards,and transferring funds,and subjectively assumes a clear attitude towards upstream criminal activities and the nature of the transferred funds,they simultaneously commit two crimes.At this time,the principle of"choosing a heavier punishment"should be applied,that is,to choose the charge with a heavier sentence according to the specific case.