殷墟甲骨文“其”爲代詞説再商榷

Reconsideration of the theory of Qi(其)as a Pronoun in the Yinxu Oracle Bone Inscriptions

本文針對以往國内學者提出的卜辭“其”爲代詞説的例子,進行了詳細的論證,對引起代詞説争議的《英藏》1864一例提出新的看法。在對國内學者提出的卜辭代詞“其”進行分析後,本文認爲這些用爲代詞的例子是不正確的。甲骨文“其”字在卜辭中應用爲副詞,没有用作代詞的例子。

This paper makes a detailed demonstration of the theory of qi(其)as a pronoun in oracle bone inscriptions which was proposed by domestic scholars in the past.This paper also advances a new view on the example of No.1864 in the Oracle-Bone Collections in Great Britain,which aroused the controversy over the pronoun theory.After analyzing the pronoun qi proposed by domestic scholars,this paper holds that these examples are incorrect.The character qi should be used as an adverb in the oracle bone inscriptions,and there is no example of using as a pronoun.