期刊文献+

聚乙二醇干扰素-α治疗原发性血小板增多症的疗效和安全性分析

Analysis of the efficacy and safety of Peg-IFN-αin the treatment of essential thrombocythemia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价聚乙二醇干扰素-α(Peg-IFN-α)治疗原发性血小板增多症(essential thrombocythemia,ET)的临床疗效及安全性。方法:纳入50例ET患者,均接受12个月以上Peg-IFN-α治疗,180μg皮下注射,以每2周1次作为起始剂量,后续根据血常规调整治疗间隔,并分析其临床疗效及不良反应。结果:Peg-IFN-α治疗ET患者的血液学反应发生较快,3个月后较初诊时血小板明显降低(508.56±120.75 vs.931.44±209.13,P=0.000),12个月时血液学完全缓解率和总缓解率分别为70%、98%;Peg-IFN-α治疗ET患者的JAK2-V617F突变负荷在治疗6个月时较初诊时明显降低(0.2541±0.1228 vs.0.3153±0.1332,P<0.0001),12个月时的分子生物学完全缓解率为12.5%,总缓解率为31.75%。患者的MPN-SAF-TSS积分在Peg-IFN-α治疗6月内下降明显(P<0.001),但12月时积分较治疗6月时变化不大(P>0.05);患者的血液学不良反应少见,均为1-2级不良反应,非血液学不良反应以流感样症状为主,绝大部分患者为1-2级,偶有≥3级的不良反应,但延长用药间隔或对症处理后患者可耐受,没有患者因不良反应而终止治疗。结论:Peg-IFN-α治疗ET有效且安全。 AIM:To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon-alpha(Peg-IFN-α)in the treatment of essential thrombocythemia(ET).METHODS:A total of 50 ET patients were treated with Peg-IFN-αfor more than 12 months.180μg was injected subcutaneously once every two weeks as the initial dose,and then the treatment interval was adjusted according to blood routine.The clinical efficacy and adverse reactions were analyzed.RESULTS:The hematologic response of ET patients treated with Peg-IFN-αoccurred quickly,and the platelet decreased significantly after 3 months(508.56±120.75 vs.931.44±209.13,P=0.000).Hematologic complete remission rate and overall remission rate at 12 months were 70%and 98%,respectively.The JAK2-V617F mutation burden of ET patients treated with Peg-IFN-αwas significantly lower at 6 months of treatment than at initial diagnosis(0.2541±0.1228 vs.0.3153±0.1332,P<0.0001).The 1-year molecular biology complete remission rate was 12.5%,and overall remission rate was 31.75%.MPN-SAF-TSS scores decreased significantly within 6 months after Peg-IFN-αtreatment(P<0.001),but there was no significant change in the score at 12 months compared with 6 months(P>0.05).Hematological adverse reactions were rare,and all of them were grade 1-2 adverse reactions.Non-hematological adverse reactions were mainly influenza-like symptoms.Most of the patients were grade 1-2,and occasionally had grade≥3 adverse reactions.All adverse reactions could be tolerated after extending medication interval or symptomatic treatment,and no patient terminated treatment because of adverse reactions.CONCLUSION:Peg-IFN-αis effective and safe in the treatment of ET.
作者 肖悦 李唐菲 薛乾富 XIAO Yue;LI Tangfei;XUE Qianfu(Department of Hematology,Yongchuan Hospital,Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 402160,China)
出处 《中国临床药理学与治疗学》 CAS CSCD 2023年第9期1049-1055,共7页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
基金 重庆市卫生健康委医学科研项目(2022WSJK081) 重庆市永川区公益类科技计划项目(YCSTC,2018nb0207)。
关键词 原发性血小板增多症 聚乙二醇干扰素Α 疗效 安全性 essential thrombocytosis pegylated interferon-α efficacy safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1Harrison CN, Bareford D, Butt N, et al. Guideline for investiga- tion and management of adults and children presenting with a thrombocytosis [J]. Br J Haematol, 2010, 149 (3):352-375. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08122.x.
  • 2Barbui T, Barosi G, Birgegard G, et al. Philadelphia-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: critical concepts and management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29 (6):761-770. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2010.31.8436.
  • 3Harrison CN, Butt N, Campbell P, et al. Modification of British Committee for Standards in Haematology diagnostic criteria for essential thrombocythaemia [J]. Br J Haematol, 2014, 167 (3): 421-423. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12986.
  • 4Vannucchi AM, Barbui T, Cervantes F, et al. Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [J]. Ann Oncol, 2015, 26 Suppl 5:v85-99. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv203.
  • 5Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia[J]. Blood, 2016, 127 (20):2391-2405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544.
  • 6Besses C, Hemfindez-Boluda JC, Prez Encinas M, et al. Current opinion and consensus statement regarding the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of patients with essential thrombocythemia: a survey of the Spanish Group of Ph-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (GEMFIN) using the Delphi method[J]. Ann Hematol, 2016, 95 (5):719-732. doi: 10.1007/ s00277-016-2614-1.
  • 7Barosi G, Mesa RA, Thiele J, et al. Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: a consensus statement from the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment[J]. Leukemia, 2008, 22(2):437-438. doi:10.1038/sj. leu.2404914.
  • 8Kvasnicka HM, Thiele J. Prodromal myeloproliferative neoplasms: the 2008 WHO classification [J]. Am J Hematol, 2010, 85( 1 ):62-69. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21543.
  • 9Barbui T, Thiele J, Vannucchi AM, et al. Problems and pitfalls regarding WHO-defined diagnosis of early/prefibrotic primarymyelofibrosis versus essential thrombocythemia [J]. Leukemia, 2013, 27( 10):1953-1958. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.74.
  • 10Barosi G. Essential thrombocythemia vs. early/prefibrotic myelo- fibrosis: why does it matter [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol, 2014, 27(2):129-140. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2014.07.004.

共引文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部