期刊文献+

交叉航路汇聚航空器临界调配间隔研究

Research of critical deployment separation of cross-route of convergence aircraft
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了减少航空器飞行状态的调配,本文以华东地区空中交通管理局上海情报中心的数据和邳县导航台所构成的航路结构为例,通过改进的概率均衡法计算临界调配间隔,原则是航空器实际间隔大于临界间隔时不需要调配,小于临界间隔时需要调配,临界间隔计算的结果为80.4735 km。通过三分法确定管制员最佳决策位置,在决策点处航空器实际间隔的临界间隔值为93.3474 km(A470)、91.3629 km(A593)。结果表明:管制员在决策点处通过临界间隔值和实际间隔比对,采取相应的策略可以减少管制调配次数和统一管制员的调配方法。 In order to reduce the deployment of the flight status of aircraft,this paper calculates the critical deployment separation based on the improved probability equilibrium method,taking the data of Shanghai Intelligence Center of the East China Air Traffic Control Bureau and the route structure of the navigation station in Pi County as an example.The principle is that no deployment is required when the critical separation is less than actual separation,while deployment is required when the critical separation is bigger than actual separation,and the calculated result of the critical separation is 80.4735 km.Then,the trichotomy is applied to determine the optimal decision-making position,of which the actual separation of the critical separation at the decision-making point is 93.3474 km(A470)and 91.3629 km(A593).The results show that the controller can reduce the number of control deployments by adopting the corresponding strategies via the comparison of the critical separation value and actual separation at the decision-making point,and the deployment method of the controller can be unified.
作者 杜实 初新宇 DU Shi;CHU Xinyu(Air Traffic Management College,CAUC,Tianjin 300300,China)
出处 《中国民航大学学报》 CAS 2023年第4期37-43,共7页 Journal of Civil Aviation University of China
基金 民航安全能力建设资金项目(20600702)。
关键词 区域管制 拒绝间隔 接受间隔 临界间隔 regional control rejected separation accepted separation critical separation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献48

  • 1彭瑛,胡明华,张颖.动态航迹推测方法[J].交通运输工程学报,2005,5(1):61-65. 被引量:30
  • 2张兆宁,张晓燕.交叉航路碰撞风险研究[J].航空计算技术,2007,37(2):1-4. 被引量:17
  • 3REICH P G. Analysis of long- range air traffic systems: separation standards I II III [ J ]. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 1966,19 ( 1 ) : 88 - 98 ; 1966,19 (2) 169 - 186 ; 1966, 19(3) :331 -347.
  • 4WAHEED S A. Mathematical model for predicting the number of potential conflict situations at intersecting air routes [ J ]. Transportation Science, 1973,7 (2) : 158 - 167.
  • 5DUNLAY W J. Analytical models of perceived air traffic control conflicts [ J ]. Transportation Science, 1975 ( 9 ) : 149 - 164.
  • 6ANDERSON D, LIN X G. Collision risk model for a crossing track separation methodology [ J ]. Journal of Navigation, 1996,49 ( 3 ) :337 - 349.
  • 7Rome H. J, Kalafus R. Impact of automatic dependent surveillance and navigation system accuracy on collision risk on intersecting tracks Proceedings of the Institute of Navigation National Technical Meeting[ M ]. Santa Barbara, 1988:213 - 222.
  • 8ANDERSON D. A collision risk analysis of intersecting tracks [S]. ICAO RGCSP WG/A WP/7,April 1998.
  • 9王欣.空中交通安全间隔问题的初步研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2000.
  • 10李冬宾.飞行间隔安全评估模型和方法研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2008.

共引文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部