摘要
随着5G等移动通信技术的发展,在未来通信领域标准必要专利纠纷案件的审理中,出于标准必要专利所具有的重大商业价值,各国法院对标准必要专利全球许可费率管辖权的争夺将会日益加剧,因此当务之急需要明确管辖权裁判的法律依据以及具体的裁判标准。本文通过对国内外相关案例的分析与比较研究,旨在进一步明确我国法院在解决标准必要专利全球许可费率管辖权纠纷时的路径选择。为了避免国际管辖权争夺可能造成的冲突,法院应当遵循当事人意思自治原则、更密切联系原则以及国际礼让原则裁判是否具有管辖权。
With the development of mobile communication technologies such as 5G,in the future hearing of standard essential patent disputes in the communication field,the significant commercial value of standard essential patents will lead to an increasing competition among national courts for global licensing rate jurisdiction over standard essential patents,so it is imperative to clarify the legal basis and specific rules of jurisdiction adjudication.Through the analysis and comparative study of relevant domestic and foreign cases,this paper aims to further clarify the path choice of Chinese courts in solving the jurisdiction dispute over the global license rate of standard essential patents.In order to avoid conflicts that may be caused by international jurisdictional disputes,the court should follow the principles of party autonomy,closer connection and international comity to decide whether there is jurisdiction.
作者
戚秋杰
QI Qiujie(School of intellectual property,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)
出处
《中国发明与专利》
2023年第9期63-72,共10页
China Invention & Patent