期刊文献+

超声造影参数联合血清TSH对微小甲状腺结节性质的鉴别效能分析 被引量:3

Differential Efficacy of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Parameters Combined with Serum TSH in the Diagnosis of Micro Thyroid Nodules
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 观察超声造影参数联合血清TSH对微小甲状腺结节性质的鉴别效能。方法 将2019年1月至2019年10月在我院进行住院治疗的94例微小甲状腺结节病例作为研究对象,所有病例均行超声甲状腺结节造影及血清TSH检测,获取超声造影参数(RT、MTT、TPH、WIS、TTP、PI、AUC)。全部患者在术中取病理组织并进行病理检查,并将检查结果作为“金标准”,同时对比超声造影联合血清TSH与病理检查结果的良恶性诊断符合率,同时进行超声造影参数联合血清TSH的结节良恶性诊断价值的ROC曲线分析。结果 手术后取病理组织显示,全部94例患者中,共有164个微小甲状腺结节中,其中良性结节有63例共108个结节,恶性结节中有31例共58个。良恶性微小甲状腺结节与血清TSH比较发现,比较差异无统计学意义。良、恶性微小甲状腺结节病例在RT、MTT、TPH、WIS、TTP上比较差异无差异性(P>0.05);恶性微小甲状腺结节病例的PI、AUC高于恶性微小甲状腺结节病例(P<0.05)。超声参数(PI、AUC)联合TSH鉴别诊断符合率(98.79%)高于超声参数PI联合TSH鉴别诊断(87.80%)、超声参数AUC联合TSH鉴别诊断(90.25%)(χ^(2)=13.129,P=0.001<0.05)。超声参数中Pl、AUC两项与血清TSH联合检测诊断的准确率、敏感性、特异性均相较于超声参数PI联合TSH较高(69.43%、72.48%、76.81%)、超声参数AUC联合TSH鉴别诊断(73.18%、85.63%、78.09%)(P<0.05)。结论 血清TSH有助于微小甲状腺结节鉴别,但超声造影参数(PI、AUC)联合血清TSH在微小甲状腺结节性质鉴别诊断中更具应用价值。 Objective To observe the differential efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameters combined with serum TSH in identifying the nature of small thyroid nodules.Method:94 cases of small thyroid nodules hospitalized in our hospital from January 2019 to October 2019 were selected as the study subjects.All cases underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound of thyroid nodules and serum TSH detection,and ultrasound contrast parameters(RT,MTT,TPH,WIS,TTP,PI,AU C)were obtained.All patients underwent pathological tissue extraction and examination during the surgery,and the examination results were used as the gold standard.At the same time,the diagnostic accuracy of benign and malignant nodules was compared between contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with serum TSH and pathological examination results.At the same time,the ROC curve analysis of the diagnostic value of nodules with contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameters combined with serum TSH was performed.After surgery,pathological tissue samples were taken from all 94 patients,showing a total of 164 small thyroid nodules.Among them,there were 63 benign nodules with 108 nodules,and 31 malignant nodules with 58 nodules.The comparison between benign and malignant small thyroid nodules and serum TSH showed no statistically significant difference.There was no significant difference in RT,MTT,TPH,WIS,and TTP between benign and malignant cases of small thyroid nodules(P>0.05);The PI and AU C of malignant microthyroid nodules were higher than those of malignant microthyroid nodules(P<0.05).The coincidence rate of ultrasound parameters(PI,AU C)combined with TSH differential diagnosis(98.79%)was higher than that of ultrasound parameters PI combined with TSH differential diagnosis(87.80%)and ultrasound parameters AU C combined with TSH differential diagnosis(90.25%)(χ^(2)=13.129,P=0.001<0.05).The accuracy,sensitivity,and specificity of the combined detection of PI and AU C in ultrasound parameters and serum TSH were higher than those of PI combined with TSH(69.43%,72.48%,76.81%),and the differential diagnosis of AU C combined with TSH(73.18%,85.63%,78.09%)(P<0.05).Conclusion:Serum TSH is helpful in distinguishing small thyroid nodules,but the combination of contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameters(PI,AU C)and serum TSH has more practical value in distinguishing the nature of small thyroid nodules.
作者 程海燕 董刚 Cheng Hai-yan;Dong Gang(The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052,Henan Province,China)
出处 《罕少疾病杂志》 2023年第9期38-40,共3页 Journal of Rare and Uncommon Diseases
关键词 超声造影 甲状腺结节 性质鉴别 TSH Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography Thyroid Nodule Property Differentiation TSH
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献113

  • 1叶丽丽,杜凡,何祥发,梁明,韦玉新,潘伟.结节性甲状腺肿与甲状腺腺瘤CT诊断价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2020,39(6):1069-1073. 被引量:12
  • 2董海英,李萍,宁春平,房世保.超声造影定量分析在甲状腺良恶性结节鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2013,10(2):110-114. 被引量:46
  • 3张滨.甲状腺癌颈淋巴结清扫术的适应证及手术要点[J].临床外科杂志,2006,14(3):139-140. 被引量:15
  • 4罗葆明,欧冰,智慧,曾婕,杨海云.改良超声弹性成像评分标准在乳腺肿块鉴别诊断中的价值[J].现代临床医学生物工程学杂志,2006,12(5):396-398. 被引量:370
  • 5Popoveniuc G,Jonklaas J. Thyroid nodules[J].Med Clin North Am, 2012,96(2) :329-349.
  • 6Bartolotta TV, Midiri M, Galia M, et al. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of solitary thyroid nodules with contrast- enhanced ultrasound : initial results[J].Eur Radiol, 2006,16 (10) : 2234-2241.
  • 7Cantisani V, Consorti F, Guerrisi A, et al. Prospective comparative evaluation of quantitative-elastosonography (Q- elastography ) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of thyroid nodules: preliminary experience[J].Eur J Radiol, 2013,82( 11 ) : 1892-1898.
  • 8Jiang J, Huang LL, Zhang HL, et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography of thyroid nodules [J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2015,43 (3):153-156.
  • 9Zhang B, Jiang YX, Liu JB, et al. Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of thyroid nodules [J]. Thyroid, 2010, 20(1 ) :51-57.
  • 10Ma JJ, Ding H, Xu BH, et al.Diagnostic performances of various gray-scale,color Doppler,and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography findings in predicting malignant thyroid nodules[J]. Thyroid, 2014,24(2) :355-363.

共引文献158

同被引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部