摘要
“逸品”作为书画领域一个极为重要的分品术语,学术界普遍认为初唐李嗣真在其《书后品》中已将其独立用作“分品目录”。对《佩文斋书画谱》《法书要录》《书苑菁华》《说郛一百二十卷》和《历代书法论文选》所著录版本对比分析,再结合李嗣真《画品录》、谢赫《画品》等文献综合考证,可发现当前所见《书后品》版本中“逸品”用作“分品目录”,应为明清刊刻者所加,并非原书所有。
As an extremely important classification term in the field of calligraphy and painting,“Yi-pin”is widely believed by the academic community to have been independently used as a“classification catalog”by LI Sichen in his book Shu-hou-pin in the early Tang Dynasty.By comparing and analyzing the published versions of several books on calligraphy and paintings by different scholars in different dynasties,such as,Pei-wen-zhai Shu-hua-pu,Fa-shu Yao-lu,Shyuan Jinhua,Shuo-fu in 120 Volumes,and Li-dai Shu-fa Lun-wen-xuan,this paper finds that“Yi-pin”as a“classification catalog”in the current version of Shu-hou-pin was not suggested in its original version which should have been added by publishers in Ming and Qing dynasties after conducting a comprehensive research on literatures,such as,LI Sichen’s Hua-pin-lv and XIE He’s Hua-pin.
作者
唐波
TANG Bo(Institute of Art Research,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610000,China)
出处
《贵州大学学报（艺术版）》
2023年第5期63-70,共8页
Journal of Guizhou University Art Edition
基金
2022年度国家社科基金艺术学西部项目“唐宋画学思想变迁研究”(项目编号:22EF210)。
