期刊文献+

无锚定匹配调整间接比较方法简介及实例应用 被引量:1

Introduction and application example of unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison method
原文传递
导出
摘要 当感兴趣的两种干预方案之间缺少头对头的随机对照试验时,可以使用间接比较方法来估计相对治疗效果。匹配调整间接比较方法(MAIC)是一种基于加权理念的人群调整间接比较方法。其中无锚定MAIC主要适用于两个干预方案间无共同对照组的情况。本文介绍无锚定MAIC的方法背景及数学理论,并通过实例展示通过无锚定MAIC估计相对疗效的操作步骤及结果。 When there is a lack of head-to-head randomized controlled trials between two interventions of interest,indirect comparison methods can be employed to estimate their relative treatment effects.Matching-adjusted indirect comparison(MAIC)is a population-adjusted indirect comparison method that utilizes a weighting approach.Unanchored MAIC is particularly applicable in scenarios where a common control group between the two interventions is not available.This article introduces the background and mathematical theory of unanchored MAIC,along with a demonstration of the operational steps and interpretation of results through an application example.
作者 刘莹 贺小宁 刘佳 吴晶 LIU Ying;HE Xiaoning;LIU Jia;WU Jing(School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,P.R.China)
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第9期1096-1101,共6页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 天津大学自主创新基金(编号:2022XHX-0024)。
关键词 匹配调整间接比较 患者个体数据 疗效 临床试验 Matching-adjusted indirect comparison Individual patient data Treatment effects Clinical trials
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献9

  • 1Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, et al. The results of direct andindirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomizedcontrolled trials. J Clin Epidemiol, 1997, 50(6): 683-691.
  • 2Song F, Loke YK, Walsh T, et al. Methodological problems in theuse of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions:a survey of published systematic reviews. BMJ, 2009,338: bl 147.
  • 3LuG, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence inmixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med, 2004, 23(20): 3105-3124.
  • 4Higgins JP, Whitehead A. Borrowing strength from external trials ina meta-analysis. Stat Medy 1996,15(24): 2733-2749.
  • 5田金徽.中药注射剂联合化疗治疗非小细胞肺癌的网状Meu分析.兰州大学,2012.
  • 6Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song FJ, et al. Indirect comparisons ofcompeting interventions. Health Technol Assess, 2005,9(26): 1-134,iii-iv.
  • 7Song F, Altman DG, Glenny AM, et al Validity of indirect compari-son for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empiricalevidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ, 2003,326(7387): 472.
  • 8廖炜圻,陈平雁.贝叶斯混合处理比较及WinBUGS实现[J].中国新药杂志,2010,19(24):2244-2248. 被引量:5
  • 9胡晶,杨智荣,詹思延.间接比较和多种干预措施比较的方法学及应用[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2011,6(6):456-459. 被引量:13

共引文献28

同被引文献22

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部