基于韦伯和SEC模式的高中化学教科书课后习题与课标一致性研究——以人教版和鲁科版《有机化学基础》为例

Consistency Between Senior High School Chemistry Curriculum Standards and Textbooks Exercises Based on Webb and SEC Mode:Fundamentals of Organic Chemistry Textbooks of People’s Education Press and Shandong Science and Technology Press

以韦伯和SEC模式对2019年人教版和鲁科版选择性必修3《有机化学基础》课后习题与课程标准的学业要求进行一致性研究。韦伯模式研究表明,2版教科书课后习题与新课标在知识种类、深度、广度上一致性较强,但在知识分布平衡性上,2版教科书中“生物大分子及合成高分子”主题与新课标一致性较弱;SEC模式研究表明,从内容分布和认知分布的整体来看,鲁科版课后习题与新课标的一致性优于人教版,但从内容分布和认知分布分别来看,2版教科书课后习题与新课标的一致性程度不同。2种模式的比较结果显示,韦伯和SEC模式在一定程度上具有相似性,且可相互印证。根据研究结果对教科书课后习题的完善和使用提出建议。

Using Webb and SEC models,the alignment between the academic requirements of the curriculum standards and the after-school exercises of the optional compulsory three Organic Chemistry Fundamentals in the 2019 People's Education Edition and Shandong Science and Technology Edition are conducted.Webb model research shows that the two editions of textbooks have strong consistency in the types,depth and breadth of knowledge between the afterschool exercises and the new curriculum standards,but in terms of the balance of knowledge distribution,the consistency of the two editions of textbooks with the new curriculum standard is weak on the theme of"biomacromolecules and synthetic polymers".SEC model research shows that,from the overall point of view of content distribution and cognitive distribution,the consistency between the Shandong Science and Technology Edition of the after-school exercises and the new curriculum standard is better than that of the PEP Edition;but from the respective view of content distribution and cognitive distribution,the two editions of textbooks have different degrees of consistency between the after-school exercises and the new curriculum standards.The comparison results of the two models show that Webb and SEC models are similar to a certain extent and can be mutually confirmed.According to the research results,suggestions are put forward for the improvement and use of after-school exercises in textbooks.