期刊文献+

超声引导下单次隐神经阻滞联合“鸡尾酒”疗法治疗全膝关节置换术后疼痛的效果

Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Single-Injection Saphenous Nerve Block Combined with Cocktail Therapy on Pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨超声引导下单次隐神经阻滞联合“鸡尾酒”疗法治疗全膝关节置换术后疼痛的临床效果。方法择期行单侧全膝关节置换术的膝关节骨性关节炎患者90例,按随机数字表法分为研究组(n=45)与对照组(n=45)。2组患者术中安放膝关节假体前均行关节周围“鸡尾酒”注射。术后即刻,研究组患者在超声引导下行隐神经阻滞麻醉,对照组患者于隐神经阻滞区注射等量生理盐水。2组患者术后行主动功能锻炼。记录并比较2组患者术后膝关节静息及活动时疼痛评分(VAS评分)、首次行走距术后时间、膝关节功能评分(KSS评分)、术后追加镇痛药物患者数及镇痛药物剂量。记录并描述患者术后并发症发生情况。结果术后12、24、48 h研究组患者膝关节静息及活动时VAS评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05);术后72 h,2组患者膝关节静息及活动时VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后12、24 h活动时,术后48 h静息时及活动时,研究组患者膝关节无痛或轻度疼痛所占比例高于对照组(P<0.05);其余时间节点2组患者膝关节不同疼痛程度所占比例差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组患者首次行走距术后时间显著短于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组患者术后3个月膝关节KSS评分及KSS评分较术前增加值均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。术后72 h内,研究组追加镇痛药物患者比例显著低于对照组(P<0.05),且追加镇痛药物剂量更少(P<0.05)。术后未见隐神经阻滞相关并发症。结论超声引导下单次隐神经阻滞联合“鸡尾酒”疗法治疗全膝关节置换术后疼痛的效果优于单纯“鸡尾酒”疗法,是一种安全、有效的多模式镇痛方法。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of ultrasound-guided single-injection saphenous nerve block combined with cocktail therapy on pain after total knee arthroplasty(TKA).Methods A total of 90 patients who received unilateral TKA were randomly divided into two groups,with 45 patients in each group.Both groups underwent peri-articular cocktail injection before implantation of the knee prosthesis.Immediately after surgery,the study group was given ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block,but the control group was injected with the same amount of normal saline in the block area.All the patients underwent active functional exercise after surgery.Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)pain scores at rest and during movement,time to the first postoperative walking,Knee Society Score(KSS),number of patients receiving analgesic drugs after surgery,dosage of analgesic drugs,and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results The VAS scores at rest and during movement in the study group were lower than those in the control group at 12,24 and 48 hours after surgery(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the VAS scores between the two groups at 72 hours after surgery(P>0.05).The proportion of patients with painless or mild pain in the study group was higher than that in the control group at rest at 12 and 24 hours after surgery,as well as at rest and during movement at 48 hours after surgery.There was no significant difference in the proportion of different degrees of knee pain between the two groups at other timepoints(P>0.05).The time to the first postoperative walking in the study group was shorter than that in the control group(P<0.05).At 3 months after operation,the KSS score in the study group was higher than that in the control group,and the increase in KSS score in the study group was greater than that in the control group(P<0.05).Within 72 hours after operation,the proportion of patients receiving additional analgesic drugs and the dosage of additional analgesic drugs in the study group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).No postoperative complications associated with saphenous nerve block were found in both groups.Conclusion As a safe,effective and multimodal analgesic method,the combination of ultrasound-guided single-injection saphenous nerve block and cocktail therapy is superior to cocktail therapy alone for pain after TKA.
作者 陈思锋 邵亮 刘丙根 何守斌 傅宇 李刚 龚婷 CHEN Si-feng;SHAO Liang;LIU Bing-gen;HE Shou-bin;FU Yu;LI Gang;GONG Ting(Department of Orthopedics,Yichun People’s Hospital,Yichun 336000,China;Department of Rheumatology and Immunology,Yichun People’s Hospital,Yichun 336000,China;Department of Orthopedics,Wanzai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Wanzai 336100,China)
出处 《实用临床医学(江西)》 CAS 2023年第4期29-33,共5页 Practical Clinical Medicine
基金 江西省卫健委科技计划(SKJP220203800)。
关键词 隐神经阻滞 “鸡尾酒”疗法 全膝关节置换术 膝关节骨性关节炎 疼痛 saphenous nerve block cocktail therapy total knee arthroplasty knee osteoarthritis pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献44

  • 1Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in post- operative recovery[J]. Lancet, 2003, 362(9399): 1921-1928.
  • 2Kehlet H. Fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty[J]. Lancet, 2013, 381(9878): 1600-1602.
  • 3Kehlet H, Thienpont E. Fast-track knee arthroplasty - status and future challenges[J]. Knee, 2013, 20: S29- 33.
  • 4Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery[J]. Ann Surg, 2008, 248(2): 189- 198.
  • 5Husted H. Fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty: clinical and orga- nizational aspects[J]. Acta Orthop Suppl, 2012, 83(346): 1- 39.
  • 6Shander A, Van Aken H, Colomina MJ, et al. Patient blood man- agement in Europe[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2012, 109(1): 55-68.
  • 7Soni A, Saini R, Gulati A, et ah Comparison between intravenous and intra-articular regimens of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(8): 1525-1527.
  • 8Jeschke MG, Klein D, Herndon DN. Insulin treatment improves the systemic inflammatory reaction to severe trauma[J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 239(4): 553-560.
  • 9Husted H, Lunn TH, Troelsen A, et al. Why still in hospital after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty?[J]. Acta Orthop, 2011, 82 (6): 679-684.
  • 10Husted H, Hansen HC, Holm G, et al. What determines length of stay ~ter total hip and knee arthroplasty? A nationwide study in Denmark[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2010, 130(2): 263-268.

共引文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部