期刊文献+

厄瓜多尔俯冲区震间闭锁与粘弹性变形研究

Study on Interseismic Locking and Viscoelastic Deformation in the Ecuador Subduction Zone
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以厄瓜多尔俯冲区为例,建立区域三维纯弹性和粘弹性模型,并基于有限元数值模拟方法分析其震间变形过程,同时以十余年的震间GPS速度场为约束,估算不同模型下的最佳震间闭锁深度。结果表明,在厄瓜多尔俯冲区,基于弹性模型的最佳震间闭锁深度约为30~35 km,而基于粘弹性模型的最佳闭锁深度为25 km。同时,相比于弹性模型,粘弹性模型能够更好地解释震间地表变形,说明该区域深部粘弹性圈层在俯冲板块的推挤作用下会引起较为明显的上地壳变形。 Taking the Ecuador subduction zone as an example,we establish a three-dimensional pure elastic and viscoelastic model of the area,and analyze the interseismic deformation based on the numerical simulation method.We estimate the optimal interseismic locking depth under different models using the interseismic GPS velocity field for more than 10 years as constraint.The results show that in the Ecuador subduction zone,the optimal interseismic locking depth based on the elastic model is about 30 to 35 km,while the optimal locking depth based on the viscoelastic model is 25 km.At the same time,compared with the elastic model,the viscoelastic model can better explain the interseismic surface deformation,indicating that in this area,the deep viscoelastic lithosphere will cause obvious upper crustal deformation under the pushing action of the subducting slabs.
作者 颜复康 田镇 杨志强 杨兵 梁沛 YAN Fukang;TIAN Zhen;YANG Zhiqiang;YANG Bing;LIANG Pei(School of Geological Engineering and Geomatics,Chang’an University,126 Yanta Road,Xi’an 710054,China)
出处 《大地测量与地球动力学》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第10期1080-1085,共6页 Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics
基金 国家自然科学基金(42104003) 中国博士后科学基金(2022M710012) 地震动力学国家重点实验室基金(LED2022B02) 长安大学中央高校基本科研业务费(300102262902,300102262909)。
关键词 数值模拟 粘弹性 闭锁深度 厄瓜多尔 震间变形 numerical simulation viscoelasticity locking depth Ecuador interseismic deformation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献67

  • 1戴王强,任隽,赵小茂,邵辉成,朱桂芝.Characteristics of horizontal crustal movement in Weihe basin and adjacent zones by GPS observation[J].Acta Seismologica Sinica(English Edition),2004,17(3):282-286. 被引量:6
  • 2张培震,甘卫军,沈正康,王敏.中国大陆现今构造作用的地块运动和连续变形耦合模型[J].地质学报,2005,79(6):748-756. 被引量:60
  • 3[1]Demets C R,Gordon D A,Stein S.Effect of Recent Revisions to the Geomagnetic Reversal Time Scale on Estimates of Current Plate Motions.Geophys.Res.Lett.,1994,21:2 191~2 194
  • 4[2]Zhang Q,Zhu W Y,Xiong Y Q.Global Plate Motion Models Incorporating the Velocity Field of ITRF96,Geophys.Res.Lett.,1999,26(18):2 813~2 816
  • 5[3]Sillard P,Altamimi Z,Boucher C.The ITRF96 Realization and Its Associated Velocity Field.Geophys.Res.Lett.,1998,25(17):3 223~3 226
  • 6[4]Solomon S C,Sleep N H.Some Simple Physical Models for Absolute Plate Motions.J.Geophys.Re.,1974,79(17):2 557~2 567
  • 7[5]Larson K M,Freymueller J T,Philipsen S.Global Plate Velocities From the Global Positioning System.J.Geophys.Res.,1997,102(B5):9 961~9 981
  • 8[6]King R W,Bock Y.Documentation for the GAMIT GPS Analysis Software,Release 9.6.Cambridge:Mass.Instit.Tech.,1997
  • 9[7]Boucher C,Altamimi Z,Sillard P.The 1997 International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF97).IERS TECHNICAL NOTE 27,Observatoire de Paris,1999
  • 10[8]Argus D F,Heflin M B.Plate Motion and Crustal Deformation Estimated with Geodetic Data from the Global Positioning System.Geophys.Re.Lett.,1995,22:1 973~1 976

共引文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部