期刊文献+

我国融合创新政策演进与评价研究 被引量:2

Evolution and Evaluation of China's Convergence Innovation Policies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 融合创新是科技突破和产业发展的重要动力,建立完善的融合创新政策体系至关重要。构建融合创新政策分析框架,利用文本挖掘、社会网络、政策工具和PMC指数模型方法,从政策主题演进、政策工具使用、政策关系网络和政策量化评价4个方面,对我国2001—2020年融合创新政策进行分析。结果表明,我国融合创新政策尚处于早期发展阶段,政策关键词数量和共现频次显著增加,但专门针对融合创新的政策数量少、涉及领域有限且量化得分相对较低;政策工具使用以面向长期的供给型和环境型为主,见效相对较快的需求型工具应用较少;政策网络已初步形成,但政策间联系不够紧密,存在较多孤立点,顶层政策设计尚不健全,政策间协同关系有待加强。最后,针对我国融合创新政策的发展特点和现存问题,为更科学有效地制定和实施融合创新政策、完善政策体系提出建议。 Resource competition among countries is becoming increasingly fierce in globalization. Countries across the world are eager to effectively utilize the existing resources to promote innovation performance,gain market share,improve core competitiveness and raise international status. Innovation in a single field may not be enough to break through the bottlenecks of core technologies, and the convergence innovation between different technical fields may provide more possibilities for this problem. As an innovation activity that blurs the existing boundaries and constraints, convergence innovation is becoming the key driving force of current innovation by converging knowledge from different science, technology, market and industry fields. However, convergence innovation does not happen naturally, it needs to be promoted and supported by policies. Therefore, it is particularly important to analyze the evolutionary process and characters, assess the representative policies effectively and summarize the insufficiencies of convergence innovation policies. Nevertheless, the existing relevant studies mainly focus on some particular industries from the perspective of a single or dual dimensions , with rare systematic studies on the evaluation of convergence innovation policies.In order to study China's national convergence innovation policies during 2001-2020, this paper constructs an analytical framework from four dimensions, i.e. policy theme evolution, policy tool usage, policy relationship network and policy quantitative evaluation, by using text mining and keyword co-occurrence network, supply-demand-environment policy tools, policy citation network and PMC index model, respectively. China's convergence innovation policies have experienced three phrases and 30 polices have been identified for this study. Firstly, the results show that the importance of convergence policies has been well recognized, but the policy system is still in its early stage. Though the numbers of relative policy keywords and the frequencies of co-words have been increased significantly, they still mainly appeared in general innovation policies in subordinate positions. Policies elaborated for convergence innovation are still deficient and mainly focus on a few technology and industry fields. Secondly, for policy tools, the long-term oriented supply-side and environmental-side tools are favored, referring to a wide range of disciplines, technologies and industries, while the relatively fast-acting demand-side are used less. The most common means are human capital support and infrastructure, mechanism and safeguard, demonstration and popularization for three policy tools respectively. Thirdly, the policy citation network has been initially formed, but the interconnections are not close enough, with quite a few isolated policies. The most commonly cited policies are three famous general innovation policies, while the influence of specific convergence policies is less significant. It means that the top-level policy design for convergence innovation has not yet been sound and the synergistic effect of policies needs to be strengthened. Fourthly, the quantitative evaluations have been carried on seven classic policies. Three policies with convergence innovation in their titles show relative lower scores than the comprehensive scores, with two of them just at an acceptable level, which means that there is great room for improvement in the convergence innovation policies .For policy makers, top-level design and overall planning are urgently needed for convergence innovation, then more dedicated policies in wider technology and industrial fields can be established accordingly in order to form a sound and robust convergence innovation policy network with the aim to lead, guide and support convergence innovation activities. At the policy level, more demand-side policy tools which can provide the initial market pull and promote the market cycle are recommended, especially in government procurement and service outsourcing, in order to make policy “combination punches”. If so, the support effect from long-term oriented supply-side and environment-side tools can be synergized with short-term oriented demand-side tools, and thus they can jointly drive convergence innovation activities.This paper proposes a universal and comprehensive framework for policy research by integrating the main policy study perspectives. It can be used for other policy studies as well. The empirical study results of China's convergence innovation policies have important practical significance for policy makers.
作者 陈子凤 陈媛媛 贾卫峰 成泷 Chen Zifeng;Chen Yuanyuan;Jia Weifeng;Cheng Long(School of Economics and Management,Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications,Xi'an 710061,China)
出处 《科技进步与对策》 北大核心 2023年第18期151-160,共10页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(71804147,72002170) 教育部人文社会科学基金一般项目(20YJA790033) 陕西省社会科学基金项目(2017S037) 陕西省科技厅软科学一般项目(2020KRM026) 陕西省教育厅智库招募项目(20JT060)。
关键词 融合创新 政策评价 政策网络 政策工具 PMC指数模型 Convergence Innovation Policy Evaluation Policy Network Policy Tool PMC Index Model
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献132

共引文献784

同被引文献37

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部