摘要
有的书籍长期把《王岩叟日录》与《王岩叟系年录》当作两本文献。然笔者查阅诸家书目,俱只见《王岩叟系年录》,无存《王岩叟日录》。《三朝名臣言行录》存录的《王岩叟系年录》的内容在《续资治通鉴长编》中却称引自《王岩叟日录》,且存录在《续资治通鉴长编》两处的同一段内容也一称引自《王岩叟系年录》,一称引自《王岩叟日录》。以上情况,足以证明《王岩叟系年录》与《王岩叟日录》就是同一本书籍,只不过是因《长编》引注不细而造成的误会。另外《长编》中提及的“王岩叟西省记”其实只是“王岩叟所记”中的一部分。
The academic circles have long regarded the Daily Records of Wang Yansou and the Chronicle of Wang Yansou as two works.However,all the bibliographies only keep the Chronicle of Wang Yansou,but not the Daily record of Wang Yansou.However,the contents of the Chronicle of Wang Yansou in the Book of words and deeds of famous officials of the three dynasties are quoted from the Daily Records of Wang Yansou,and the same paragraph recorded in the two parts of the XuZizhiTongjianChangbian is also cited from the Chronicle of Wang Yansou,and the other is cited from the Daily Records of Wang Yansou.The above evidence is sufficient to prove that the Chronicle of Wang Yansou and the Daily Records of Wang Yansou are the same book,but it is only a misunderstanding caused by the lax quotation of the XuZizhiTongjianChangbian.In addition,the Chronicles of the Old Province of Wang Yansou mentioned in the Changbian is actually only a part of the Records of WangYansou,and it also causes misunderstandings in the academic circles because of Li Tao's small section of it.
出处
《贵州文史丛刊》
2023年第3期88-94,共7页
GUIZHOU CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL JOURNAL