期刊文献+

美国研究型大学教师薪酬特征、策略与影响因素研究 被引量:1

The Research on the Characteristics,Strategies and Influencing Factors of Faculty Compensation in American Research Universities
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国研究型大学能够始终保持雄厚的高等教育实力并处于世界大学发展前列和其拥有顶尖的教师队伍关系密切,而能够吸引和留住人才的薪酬体系是其葆有人才的重要支撑点。美国研究型大学教师整体薪酬较高,教师薪酬支出占学校总支出比例高;教师薪酬存在地域、学科和性别差异;教师薪酬受学校层次、属性和教师职称影响。美国研究型大学奉行薪酬理念先行、依据市场调节、薪酬梯级设置、注重内部公平的薪酬策略。治理体系的影响、管理机制的决定、竞争环境的驱动以及行业协会的规范是影响美国研究型大学教师薪酬制定的重要因素。 The reason why American research universities can always maintain their strength and the top places in the world is closely related to their top-level faculty.The compensation system is an im-portant supporting pillar to attract and retain talent.Overall,faculty compensation in American re-search universities is relatively high,and so is the proportion of faculty salary expenditure in the total expenditure of the university.There are regional,disciplinary and gender differences in faculty compen-sation.School attributes and faculty members'professional titles affect the compensation level.The strategies adopted by American research universities include:advancing the philosophical idea of com-pensation,relying on market moderation,setting a salary ladder,and emphasizing internal fairness.The governance system,management mechanisms,competitive environment,and the norms set by the industry associations are the influential factors guiding American research universities in setting up the compensation system for their faculty.
作者 王贤娴 眭依凡 WANG Xian-xian;SUI Yi-fan(College of Education,Soochow University,Suzhou,Jiangsu,215123;Institute of Higher Education,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou,Zhejiang,810058)
出处 《清华大学教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2023年第4期111-121,共11页 Tsinghua Journal of Education
关键词 美国研究型大学 薪酬特征 薪酬策略 American research universities characteristics of the compensation system compensation strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献63

  • 1贾永堂,邹宁.大学校院间财力资源配置的基本样态、行动逻辑及优化路径[J].教育发展研究,2021(3):68-76. 被引量:5
  • 2刘婉华,袁汝海,裴兆宏,甘雪妮.高校教师工资待遇国际比较与思考[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,19(6):86-92. 被引量:67
  • 3顾远飞,别敦荣.我国公立大学内部资源的配置机制探析[J].清华大学教育研究,2007,28(1):82-90. 被引量:8
  • 4余强.现今美国大学教师工资的总体水平及其结构研究[J].比较教育研究,2007,28(7):58-61. 被引量:5
  • 5McCormick, Alexander C, ed. (2001). The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, 2000 Edition. Menlo Park, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2001 :p.Ⅶ, 1,5,14.
  • 6John R. (2004). Thelin, A History of American Higher Education, The John Hopkins University Press, Chapter 7,265, 317, 279.
  • 7Thomas D. ( 1993 ). Snyder. 120 Years of American Education : A Statistical Portrait, National Center for Education Statistics, 65.
  • 8Trow Martin, (2005). Reflections on the Transition from Elite to Mass to Universal Access: Forms and Phases of Higher Education in Modern Societies since WWⅡ, Philip Altbach, ed. , International Handbook of Higher Education, Kluwer. pp. 4-5.
  • 9Harold L. (1974). Enarson "Book review for the Priorities for Action: Final Report of the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education", The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 45(Apr.) pp. 311-312.
  • 10Clark Kerr. ( 1991 ). The Great Transformation in Higher Education 1960 - 1980, State University of New York Press, Prologue.

共引文献167

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部