流动经历对博士生科研产出的影响

The Influence of Mobility Experience on Research Output of Doctoral Students

【目的】分析博士生的教育经历与科研产出的关系,可以为博士生的招生、录取等工作提供参考依据。【方法】本研究根据博士生在本科、硕士、博士阶段的就读学校是否相同,将其流动经历分为ABC、AAC、CBC、ACC四种,并探讨流动经历对科研产出的影响。收集了武汉大学博士毕业生的数据,运用t检验和单因素方差分析方法,从流动经历是否影响科研产出、流动类型如何影响科研产出两个方面展开研究。【结果】结果发现,无流动经历的博士生,其科研产出的数量和质量高于有流动经历的博士生;在理工类学科中,不同流动类型的博士生,其科研产出存在显著不同,在其他学科中未见明显差异;不同流动类型的博士生在科研产出的质量上存在显著差异,具体表现为ACC型博士生的科研产出质量明显高于ABC型。【结论】博士生的流动经历影响其科研产出,但这种影响存在学科差异。

[Purposes]The analysis of the relationship between the educational experience and the scientific research output of doctoral students can provide reference for the recruitment of doctoral students.[Methods]In this paper,mobility experience of doctoral students is divided into ABC,AAC,CBC and ACC according to whether they attend the same universities during undergraduate,master and doctoral stages,and the influence of mobility experience on research output is discussed.The data of doctoral graduates from Wuhan University are collected,and T-test and one-way analysis of variance are used to study whether flow experience affects research output and how flow type affects research output.[Findings]The results show that the quantity and quality of research output of doctoral students without mobile experience is higher than that of doctoral students with mobile experience.In science and engineering disciplines,the research output of doctoral students with different flow types is significantly different,but no significant difference is found in other disciplines.Doctoral students with different flow types have significant differences in the quality of research output,and more specifically,the quality of research output of ACC doctoral students is significantly higher than that of ABC doctoral students.[Conclusions]The mobility experience of doctoral students affects their research output,but the influence is different in different disciplines.