期刊文献+

机器人辅助全膝关节置换的学习曲线分析

Learning curve analysis of robotic knee system assisted total knee arthroplasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]分析机器人膝关节系统辅助全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty,TKA)的学习曲线。[方法]纳入2021年9月—2022年9月在本院进行机器人膝关节系统辅助TKA手术的17例膝关节炎患者。采用累计求和(cumulative summa⁃tion,CUSUM)法分析学习曲线。[结果]根据手术先后顺序,前10例为学习组,后7例为成熟组。成熟组手术时间[(123.3±11.3)min vs(147.3±11.3)min,P<0.05]、运用机器人膝关节系统定位时间[(15.9±2.1)min vs(22.2±6.1)min,P<0.05]、调整计划假体时间[(17.6±4.2)min vs(23.5±5.2)min,P<0.05]均显著优于学习组;两组间股骨注册时间、胫骨注册时间、股骨远端截骨时间、胫骨近端截骨时间、股骨四合一截骨时间、围术期失血量、术后HKA角、切口愈合、住院时间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后1个月KSS临床评分、KSS功能评分、HSS评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]机器人膝关节系统辅助全膝关节置换术的学习曲线在10例手术左右。 [Objective]To analyze the learning curve of robotic knee systemassisted total knee arthroplasty(TKA).[Methods]From September 2021 to September 2022,17 patients with knee arthritis underwent robotic knee systemassisted TKA surgery in our hospital.The learning curve was analyzed through the cumulative summation(CUSUM)method.The baseline characteristics,operation conditions,and postoperative outcomes at different stages of the learning curve were compared.[Results]The operation time showed a downward trend with the increase of the number of operations,and the inflection point of the learning curve was around the 10th operation.Based on the sequence,the patients were divided into the learning group and the mature group.There was no statistically significant difference in age,gender composition and course of disease between the two groups(P>0.05).The mature group proved significantly superior to the learning group in terms of operation time[(123.3±11.3)min vs(147.3±11.3)min,P<0.05],the positioning time of the robot knee system[(15.9±2.1)min vs(22.2±6.1)min,P<0.05],the prosthetic planning time[(17.6±4.2)min vs(23.5±5.2)min,P<0.05],nevertheless,there were no significant differences in femoral registration time,tibial registration time,distal femoral osteotomy time,proximal tibial osteotomy time,femoral four-in-one osteotomy time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative HKA,incision healing,and hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05).In addition,there were no significant differences in KSS clinical score,KSS functional score and HSS score between the two groups 1 month after surgery(P>0.05).[Conclusion]The learning curve of robotic knee system-assisted TKA surgery is around 10 operations.
作者 王璠 刘长兴 孙水 WANG Fan;LIU Chang-xing;SUN Shui(Department of Joint Surgery,Shandong Provincial Hospital,Shandong University,Jinan250012,China)
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第17期1617-1620,共4页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 全膝关节置换术 机器人手术 学习曲线 total knee arthroplasty robotic surgery learning curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1Pei G,Yan Y.Current status and progress of digital orthopaedics in China[J].J Orthop Tran,2014,2(1):107-117.
  • 2Gomes P.Surgical robotics:Reviewing the past,analysing the present,imagining the future[J].Robot Comput Integr Manuf,2011,27(2):261-266.
  • 3Schulz AP,Seide K,Queitsch C,et al.Results of total hip replacement using the Robodoc surgical assistant system:clinical outcome and evaluation of complications for 97 procedures[J].Int J Med Robot,2007,3(4):301-306.
  • 4Pransky J.ROBODOC‐surgical robot success story[J].Industrial Robot:An International Journal,1997,24(30):231-233.
  • 5Roche M,Horowitz S,Conditt M.Four year outcomes of robotically guided UKA[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,2012,94-B(1):30.
  • 6Coon TM,Driscoll MD,Conditt MA.Early clinical success of novel tactile guided UKA technique[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,2010,92(2):116-116.
  • 7Lonner JH.Robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty[J].Semin Arthroplasty,2009,20(2):15-22.
  • 8Lonner JH,Kerr GJ.Robotically Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty[J].Oper Tech Orthop,2012,22(2):182-188.
  • 9宋国立,赵忆文.骨科手术机器人及其导航技术[J].Chin Sci Bull(Chinese Version),2013,58(1):58.
  • 10Onen MR,Simsek M,Naderi S.Robotic spine surgery:a preliminary report[J].Turk Neuro Surg,2014,24(4):512-518.

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部