期刊文献+

成本控制与棘轮效应:节约分成激励vs.目标分成激励 被引量:1

Cost Control and Ratchet Effect:Sharing Saving Incentive Mechanism vs.Target Incentive Mechanism
原文传递
导出
摘要 国企总部授权生产单元进行成本控制,预期到上期绩效可能成为下期成本预算的参考,高能力管理者有动机在当期付出低努力、假扮低能力管理者,隐藏真实效率,实现高成本,棘轮效应出现。考察并比较两个激励机制,即节约分成(成本实际数低于预算数的分成)和目标分成(实现成本降低目标后的节约分成)对这一效应的作用。动态、逆向选择的委托代理关系下,委托人承诺长期特定激励机制(有着固定结构和变动参数),但不承诺任何跨期激励方案(有着固定结构和固定参数),棘轮效应出现,且随激励机制不同而变化。研究表明,在一个完美贝叶斯均衡中,相比节约分成激励机制,目标分成激励机制更能弱化棘轮效应。 In response to the impact of Novel coronavirus pneumonia,China State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited is implementing Cost Engineering Project regarded as a life project concerning the future destiny of the group.China State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited is trying its best to reduce the cost and expenses of shipbuilding.Our universtiy has a long history with the group and used to belong to it.Being separated,both sides still have closely strategic cooperation.Therefore,we are deeply involved in this project lasted for one year.During the course of cooperation,it seems that there was a serious asymmetry about shipbuilding cost information between group and shipyards.Headquarters of state-owned enterprise(principal)authorizes produc⁃tion unit(agent)to proceed cost control.It is reasonable to anticipate that the performance of cost control in previous period might become the reference of next budget cost.Agent with high ability is inclined to make low effort so as to conceal real efficiency,high cost followed in current period,which is ratchet effect.The impact of two kinds of incentive mechanism is examined and compared,i.e.,saving sharing of cost reduction(realized number of cost is lower than budget)and target sharing(share after completion of cost reduction target),on the ratchet effect.In a principal-agent relationship with dynamic and adverse selection,the principal commits a longterm specific incentive mechanism(with fixed structure and variable parameters),but doesn't commit intertemporal incentive scheme(with fixed structure and fixed parameters).Then the ratchet effect occurs but varies with the different incentive mechanism.Game theory is employed to explore the analysis framework of principal-agent based on the theory of information asymmetry.This study shows target sharing incentive mechanism(TIM)could weaken ratchet effect efficiently compared with saving sharing incentive mechanism(SIM)in a perfect Bayesian equilibrium.
作者 崔健波 罗正英 CUI Jian-bo;LUO Zheng-ying(School of Economics and Management,Jiangsu University of Science and Technology,Zhenjiang 212100,China;Dongwu Business School,Soochow University,Suzhou 215006,China)
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第8期90-99,共10页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 江苏省社会科学基金资助一般项目(19GLB004)。
关键词 成本控制 棘轮效应 节约分成激励机制 目标分成激励机制 cost control ratchet effect sharing saving incentive mechanism(SIM) target incentive mechanism(TIM)
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献63

  • 1刘浪,石岩.回购契约下供应链协调应对非常规突发事件[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2014,16(5):108-113. 被引量:13
  • 2宋文彪.现代企业成本管理的转变[J].经济问题,2006(2):32-33. 被引量:9
  • 3管宝云,赵全超.高新技术企业知识型员工成长需求与激励机制设计研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,27(4):122-126. 被引量:48
  • 4Mclean T, Tyson T. Standard costs, standard costing and the introduction of scientific management and new technology into the post-second world war sunderland shipbuilding industry[J]. Accounting, Business & Financial History, 2006, 16(3): 389-417.
  • 5Dossi A, Patelli L, Zoni L. The missing link between corporate performance measurement systems and chief executive officer incentive plans[J]. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 2010, 25(4): 531-558.
  • 6Lemieux T, MacLeod W B, Parent D. Performance pay and wage inequality[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2009, 124(1): 1-49.
  • 7Chan D W M, Chan A P C, Lam P T I, et al. An empirical survey of the motives and benefits of adopting guaranteed maximum price and target cost contracts in construction[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2011, 29(5): 577-590.
  • 8Mundy J. Creating dynamic tensions through a balanced use of management control systems[J]. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 2010, 35(5): 499-523.
  • 9邓柳燕. 影响企业成本控制的人本因素归纳[J]. 财经界(学术版), 2008(10): 76.
  • 10Brown D A, Booth P, Giacobbe F. Technological and organizational influences on the adoption of activity-based costing in australia[J]. Accounting & Finance, 2004, 44(3): 329-356.

共引文献75

同被引文献22

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部