实证类汉语学术期刊论文中的自我指称与作者身份构建

Self-mention and authorial identity construction in empirical Chinese academic journal papers

本研究基于自建语料库,采用对应分析和多重对应分析方法,考察实证类汉语学术期刊论文中的自我指称形式与作者身份建构、论文语类、搭配动词之间的关系。研究发现:自我指称形式,多采用“我们”“本研究”和“本文”,其中抽象主体“本文”和“本研究”功能分工较为明确,前者主要与研究动词、意愿动词、认知动词和言语动词搭配,在摘要、方法语类中,承担“研究过程叙述者”“引导者”“语篇构建者”三种低风险身份;后者则倾向与结果动词共现,出现在讨论、结论语类中,构建“观点持有者”和“新知识创建者”两种高风险身份。相比之下,第一人称复数“我们”具有多功能性,在论文不同语类中搭配不同的动词,其所构建的作者身份涵盖以上五种及独有功能“群体代表”。本研究对汉语学术语篇中自我指称的使用特征进行了细致描写,研究结果可为学术汉语写作教学提供参考。

Based on the self-built corpus,this study investigates the relationship between self-mention forms and authorial identity construction,genre,and collocational verbs in empirical Chinese academic journal papers using correspondence analysis and multiple correspondence analysis.The study found that the forms of self-reference were mostly we(我们),this study(本研究),and this paper(本文),among which the abstract subjects this paper(本文)and this study(本研究)were mostly used.The former mainly assumes three low-risk roles(recounter of the research process,guide,architect)paired with research verbs,intentional verbs,cognitive verbs,and verbal verbs in the abstract and method sections.The latter tends to construct two high-risk roles(opinion-holder,originator)co-occurring with resulting verbs in discussion and conclusion sections.In contrast,the first-person plural we(我们)is versatile with different verbs in different sections of the papers.The authorial identity it constructs covers the above five types and the unique role of representative.This study provides a detailed description of the characteristics of the use of self-mention in academic Chinese discourse,and the results can be used as a reference for teaching academic Chinese writing.