摘要
目的:观察中药护膝治疗膝骨关节炎(KOA)的临床效果。方法:选择120例KOA患者为对象进行回顾性分析,根据治疗方法不同分为对照组、试验A组、试验B组各40例。3组均口服塞来昔布胶囊消炎止痛,试验A组采用中药护膝热熨敷,试验B组采用普通艾盐包热熨敷。3组均治疗3周。比较3组治疗前、治疗7 d、治疗14 d的疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、骨性关节炎指数量表(WOMAC)评分、Lysholm指数评分,并比较3组临床疗效及不良反应发生情况。结果:治疗前,3组VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗7 d、治疗14 d,3组VAS评分均逐渐下降(P<0.05),且试验A组低于试验B组(P<0.05),试验B组低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗前,3组WOMAC评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗7 d、治疗14 d,3组WOMAC评分均逐渐下降(P<0.05),且试验A组低于试验B组(P<0.05),试验B组低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗前,3组Lysholm指数评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗7 d、治疗14 d,3组Lysholm指数评分逐渐升高(P<0.05),且试验A组高于试验B组(P<0.05),试验B组高于对照组(P<0.05)。试验A组治疗总有效率97.50%,高于试验B组80.00%(P<0.05);试验B组总有效率高于对照组77.50%(P<0.05)。3组均未发生明显不良反应。结论:中药护膝治疗KOA患者能有效减轻膝关节疼痛,改善膝关节功能,且安全性高。
Objective:To observe the clinical effect of kneecaps with Chinese medicine on knee osteoarthritis(KOA).Methods:A total of 120 KOA patients were given retrospective analysis and divided into the control group,the trial group A and the trial group B according to different treatment methods,with 40 cases in each group.The three groups were given oral administration of Celecoxib Capsules for relieving inflammation and pain,the trial group A was treated with hot compress of kneecaps with Chinese medicine and the trial group B was given hot compress of common moxa salt package.Both three groups were treated for 3 weeks.The scores of Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)for pain,Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index(WOMAC)and Lysholm before treatment,and at the seventh and fourteenth days of treatment were compared between the three groups;the clinical effects and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the three groups.Results:Before treatment,there was no significant difference being found in the comparison of VAS score between the three groups(P>0.05);at the seventh and fourteenth days of treatment,the VAS scores in the three groups were gradually decreased(P<0.05),the VAS score in the trial group A was lower than that in the trial group B(P<0.05)and the VAS score in the trial group B was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no significant difference being found in the comparison of WOMAC score between the three groups(P>0.05);at the seventh and fourteenth days of treatment,the WOMAC scores in the three groups were gradually decreased(P<0.05),the WOMAC score in the trial group A was lower than that in the trial group B(P<0.05)and the WOMAC score in the trial group B was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no significant difference being found in the comparison of Lysholm score between the three groups(P>0.05);at the seventh and fourteenth days of treatment,the Lysholm scores in the three groups were gradually increased(P<0.05),the Lysholm score in the trial group A was higher than that in the experiment group B(P<0.05)and the Lysholm score in the trial group B was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).The total effective rate was 97.50%in the trial group A,higher than that of 80.00%in the trial group B(χ^(2)=6.134,P=0.013);the total effective rate in the trial group B was higher than that of 77.50%in the control group(χ2=0.075,P=0.785).There was no obvious adverse reaction in the three groups.Conclusion:The kneecaps with Chinese medicine for KOA can effectively mitigate the knee pain and improve the function of knees with good safety.
作者
季芸
冷燕奎
梁晟
徐剑珊
JI Yun;LENG Yanquan;LIANG Sheng;XU Jianshan(Department of Orthopedics,Jinhua Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University,Jinhua Zhejing 321000,China)
出处
《新中医》
CAS
2023年第17期210-214,共5页
New Chinese Medicine
基金
金华市中医药科研项目(2021jzk20)。
关键词
膝骨关节炎
中药护膝
视觉模拟评分法评分
骨性关节炎指数量表
Lysholm指数评分
Knee osteoarthritis
Kneecaps with Chinese medicine
Score of Visual Analogue Scale
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index
Lysholm score