优质护理在盆腔炎护理中的应用效果及满意情况

Application Effect and Satisfaction of High-quality Nursing in Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Care

目的 探讨优质护理干预在盆腔炎患者中的应用效果及满意情况。方法 选取2020年5月至2022年9月医院收治的94例盆腔炎患者作为研究对象。根据随机数字表法将其分为对照组(47例)和观察组(47例)。对照组予以常规护理干预,观察组在对照组基础上予以优质护理干预。评估两组患者的遵医行为、自我效能[自我效能感量表(GSES)]、负性情绪[焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)]、健康状况[诺丁汉健康量表(NHP)]、满意度及生活质量。结果 干预后,观察组的遵医行为及GSES评分分别为(13.60±1.03)分、(32.89±2.08)分,均高于对照组的(11.07±0.99)分、(27.45±2.04)分,差异有统计学意义(t=12.141、12.801,P<0.05)。干预后,两组患者的SAS、SDS评分均较前降低,且观察组(49.78±8.42)分、(51.22±10.56)分较对照组的(56.39±10.30)分、(59.77±14.39)分降低幅度更明显,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后,两组患者的NHP较干预前降低,且观察组(28.68±10.36)分比对照组的(36.46±12.25)分降低幅度更明显,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后,观察组服务态度、沟通能力、责任心、健康教育评分(95.45±1.75)、(96.41±2.34)、(98.24±3.45)、(54.69±10.07)、(94.73±2.49)分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后,观察组情绪功能、认知功能、角色功能、社会功能、总分(52.75±6.71)、(46.98±6.23)、(47.64±12.98)、(54.69±10.07)、(47.24±7.99)、(48.76±10.39)分高对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 慢性盆腔炎患者应用优质护理干预可改善患者的负性情绪及健康状况,提高其遵医行为、自我效能及满意度,继而提升患者的生活质量。

Objective To investigate the application effect and satisfaction of quality nursing intervention in patients with pelvic inflammatory disease.Methods A total of 94 patients with pelvic inflammatory disease admitted to the hospital from May 2020 to September 2022 were enrolled.According to the random number table method,they were divided into the control group(47 cases)and the observation group(47 cases).The control group gave routine intervention,and the observation group gave high-quality nursing intervention on the basis of the control group.Both groups assessed compliance behavior,self-efficacy[General Self-efficacy Scale,(GSES)],negative mood[Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS),Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS)],health status[Nottingham Health Scale(NHP)],satisfaction and quality of life.Results After the intervention,the compliance behavior and GSES scores of the observation group were(13.60±1.03)and(32.89±2.08),respectively,which were higher than those in the control group(11.07±0.99)and(27.45±2.04),and the differences were statistically significant(t=12.141,12.801,P<0.05).After the intervention,the SAS and SDS scores of the two groups were lower than the previous ones,and the scores of(49.78±8.42)and(51.22±10.56)in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(56.39±10.30)and(59.77±14.39),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After the intervention,NHP was lower in the two groups than before the intervention,and the observation group(28.68±10.36)was significantly lower than that in the control group(36.46±12.25),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After the intervention,the service attitude,communication ability,sense of responsibility,and health education scores of the observation group(95.45±1.75),(96.41±2.34),(98.24±3.45),(54.69±10.07),and(94.73±2.49)were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After the intervention,the total scores of emotional function,cognitive function,role function,social function in the he observation group were(52.75±6.71),(46.98±6.23),(47.64±12.98),(54.69±10.07),(47.24±7.99),(48.76±10.39)scores,which were higher than those in the experimental group,with statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions Quality nursing intervention in patients with chronic pelvic inflammatory disease can improve their negative mood and health status,improve their compliance behavior,self-efficacy and satisfaction,and then improve their quality of life.