期刊文献+

基于蚁群优化的长短时神经网络变外形飞行器故障模式识别

Fault Mode Recognition for Variable Shape Vehicles Based on ACO-LSTM
下载PDF
导出
摘要 变外形飞行器机械结构复杂,在变外形过程中发生故障的概率大,传感器测量成本高,针对这些问题,提出了一种基于长短时神经网络进行飞行器测试故障诊断的方法。首先根据变外形飞行器的气动参数模型和非线性动力学模型,构建变外形飞行器执行机构故障特征数据库。然后针对变外形飞行器发生故障时的序列化特征数据,提出基于长短时神经网络的执行器故障诊断框架。利用蚁群优化算法对网络训练的超参数进行优化,提高故障诊断的准确性与泛化性。通过仿真验证了该方法可实现变外形飞行器的低成本、高效率、高精度的故障快速定位。 A method of missile test fault diagnosis based on the long and short time neural network is proposed for the problems of complex mechanical structure which has variable shape missile,high probability of failure in the process of variable shape and high cost of sensor measurement.First,an actuator fault characteristics database of the variable shape vehicle is constructed based on the aerodynamic parameter model and the nonlinear dynamics model of the variable shape vehicle.Then,an actuator fault diagnosis framework based on the long-short time neural network is proposed for the serialized feature data in the event of a failure of the variable shape vehicle.An ant colony optimization algorithm is used to optimize the hyperparameters of network training to improve the accuracy and generalization of fault diagnosis.It is verified through simulation that the method can achieve low-cost,high-efficiency,and high-accuracy fault rapid localization for variable-profile missiles.
作者 张万超 倪昊 舒鹏 孙晓晖 史树峰 ZHANG Wanchao;NI Hao;SHU Peng;SUN Xiaohui;SHI Shufeng(Shanghai Aerospace Control Technology Institute,Shanghai 201109;The Third Military Representative Office in Nanjing Military Representative Bureau of the CPLA Land Force Equipment Department in Shanghai,Shanghai 201109)
出处 《飞控与探测》 2023年第3期72-77,共6页 Flight Control & Detection
关键词 变外形飞行器 故障模式识别 长短时神经网络 蚁群优化 深度学习 variable shape vehicle fault pattern recognition LSTM ant colony optimization deep learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献43

  • 1徐萍,康锐.预测与状态管理系统(PHM)技术研究[J].测控技术,2004,23(12):58-60. 被引量:31
  • 2HESS A, FILA L. The joint strike fighter (JSF) PHM Concept: Potential impact on aging aircraft problems[C]. Proceedings of IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, USA, 2002, 6: 3021-3026.
  • 3KEITH M J, RAYMOND R B. Diagnostics to Prognostics - A product availability technology evolution[C]. The 53rd Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium(RAMS 2007), Orlando, FL, USA, 2007: 113-118.
  • 4NISHAD P, DIGANTA D, GOEBEL K, et al. Identification of Failure Precursor Parameters for Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBTs)[C]. 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management(PHM 2008), Denver, CO, USA, 2008: 1-5.
  • 5ANDREW K S, LIN D, BANJEVIC D. A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics inplementing condition-based maintenance[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2006,20: 1483-1510.
  • 6MICHAEL G P.Prognostics and health management of electronics[M]. John Wiley & Sons. Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2008: 3-20.
  • 7ANDREW H, LEO F. The joint strike fighter (JSF) PHM concept: Potential impact on aging aircraft problems[C], Proceedings of IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, USA, 2002,6: 3021-3026.
  • 8潘全文 李天 李行善.预测与健康管理系统体系结构研究.电子测量与仪器学报,2007,:32-37.
  • 9HESS A C, FRITH G P. Challenges, issues, and lessons learned chasing the "Big P". Real predictive prognostics. Partl[C]. 2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, USA, 2005: 3610-3619.
  • 10VACHTSEVANOS G. LEWIS F, ROEMER M, et al. Intelligent Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis for Engineering Systems[M]. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2006: 284-354.

共引文献319

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部