期刊文献+

欧盟移民与庇护政策一体化的困境与出路——基于后功能主义理论的视角

Dilemma and the Way Forward for the Integration of EU Migration and Asylum Policy:An Analysis from the Perspective of Postfunctionalist Theories
原文传递
导出
摘要 欧盟共同移民与庇护政策是欧洲一体化的重要组成部分,2015年的欧洲难民危机暴露出该政策的诸多缺陷,此后欧盟寻求改革却屡陷困境。依据后功能主义理论,欧盟成员国的民族国家身份认同与欧盟认同兼容性有限,在面对欧盟外国家移民群体时,排斥性的民族国家身份认同更是占据主导。因此,欧盟始终难以健全既公正团结又稳定灵活的共同移民与庇护政策体系。俄乌冲突爆发后,成员国积极接纳与安置乌克兰难民,实际上是对乌克兰公民展现出包容性的民族国家身份认同。欧盟为了提高区域内部政策一致性,在移民和难民问题上或许只能突出欧盟内外分界,共同移民与庇护政策在未来也会愈发侧重外部解决路径。 The European Union’s common migration and asylum policy is one of the key policy domains of European integration.The 2015 refugee crisis revealed many shortcomings of EU’s migration and asylum policy,which has since been consistently plagued by difficulties in seeking reform.Post-functionalist theories suggest that the limited compatibility between national identity and European identity,and the dominance of national identity in EU countries’dealing with migrants from non-EU states are the main reasons why the EU has been struggling to develop a common migration and asylum policy that is fair and cohesive,and at the same time stable and flexible.Since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict,EU members have actively accepted and resettled large numbers of Ukrainian refugees,demonstrating the inclusiveness of national identity to the Ukrainians.To improve policy coherence,the European Union may have to distinguish between the migrants from EU states and those from non-EU states.It is likely that EU’s common migration and asylum policy will increasingly focus on external solutions in the future.
作者 郑春荣 叶思雨 Zheng Chunrong;Ye Siyu
出处 《国际政治研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2023年第3期9-30,5,共23页 The Journal of International Studies
基金 国家社会科学基金重大研究专项(项目批准号:20VGQ011)的阶段性成果。
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献112

  • 1苟利武.拉脱维亚“非公民”问题成因、挑战与应对[J].历史教学问题,2021(1):109-118. 被引量:1
  • 2Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks, "A Posffunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus" , British Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 39, pp. 1 - 25, First Published Online by Cambridge University Press, 27 October, 2008.
  • 3Philippe C, Schmitter, "On the Way to a Post-functionalist Theory of European Integration", British Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 39, pp. 211 -215, First Published Online by Cambridge University Press, 10 November, 2008.
  • 4Tanja A. Borzel and Thomas Risse, "Revisiting the Nature of the Beast -Politicization, European Identity, and Posffunetionalism: A Comment on Hooghe and Marks", British Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 39, pp. 217 -220, First Published Online by Cambridge University Press, 10 November, 2008.
  • 5Hanspeter Kriesi, "Rejoinder to Lisbet Hooghe and Gary Marks,A Posffunctionedist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus ", British Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 39, pp. 221 - 224, First Published Online by Cambridge University Press, 10 November, 2008.
  • 6Ben Rosamond, Theories of European Integration, London: Macmillan Press Ltd. , 2000, p. 50.
  • 7Ernst B. Haas, "Does Constructivism Subsume Neo-functionalism?", in Thomas Christiansen et al. , The Social Construction of Europe, London : SAGE Publication, 2001, pp. 22 - 31.
  • 8Philippe C. Schmitter, " Neo-Neofunctionalism", in Antje Wiener and Thomas Diez eds. , European In- tegration Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, p. 45.
  • 9Borzel Tanja ed. , "Ernst B. Haas and the legacy of Neofunctionalism", Special Issue, Journal of European Public Policy, No. 2, Vol. 12, 2005.
  • 10Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks, "The Neofunctionalists Were(almost) Right: Politicization and European Integration", Webpapers, Constitutionlism & Governance beyond the State, No. 5,2005, http://www. bath. ac. uk/esml/conWEB/Conweb% 20papers -filestore/conweb5 -2005. pdf.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部