期刊文献+

三方博弈视角下供应商社会责任审查策略研究

Research on the Audit Strategies of the Supplier Social Responsibility from the Perspective of Tripartite Game
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分别构建政府单独审查、政府与核心企业独立审查、合作审查博弈模型,探讨核心企业参与审查的条件以及参与审查时的最优审查机制选择。研究表明:①当政府面临的潜在损失大时,核心企业不参与审查;当政府面临的潜在损失小时,若供应商合规意愿低,核心企业参与独立审查,否则参与合作审查。②相较于政府单独审查,核心企业参与合作审查将提高供应商合规水平;而参与独立审查只有在政府面临的潜在损失小时,才能提高供应商合规水平,即核心企业参与审查并不总能提高供应商合规水平。此外,通过数值实验分析了重要参数对最优策略的影响。 This study constructs three game models of the government-only audit,the government-focal firm independent audit,and the joint audit to explore the conditions under which the focal firm participates in the audit and the selection of the optimal audit mechanism when it participates in the audit.The results show that,firstly,when the government faces a high potential loss,the focal firm will not participate in the audit.When the government faces a low potential loss,the focal firm will participate in the independent audit if the supplier has a low compliance willingness,otherwise,it will participate in the joint audit.Secondly,compared to the government-only audit,the focal firm’s participation in the joint audit will improve the supplier’s compliance level,while in the independent audit,it will improve the compliance level only when the government faces a low potential loss.That is,the participation of the focal firm in the audit does not always improve the compliance level of the supplier.Furthermore,the impact of important parameters on the optimal strategies is also investigated through numerical experiments.
作者 赵连霞 刘佳 张小峰 周文泳 ZHAO Lianxia;LIU Jia;ZHANG Xiaofeng;ZHOU Wenyong(Shanghai University,Shanghai,China;Tongji University,Shanghai,China)
出处 《管理学报》 北大核心 2023年第9期1380-1388,共9页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(20YJAZH135) 上海市“科技创新行动计划”软科学研究资助项目(22692109100) 科学技术部科技创新战略研究专项资助项目(ZLY202148)。
关键词 审查 企业社会责任 联合监管 博弈模型 audit corporate social responsibility joint supervision game model
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献54

共引文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部