期刊文献+

三种断层位移测量工具对比分析

Comparative analysis of three types of tools to measure fault displacements
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于构造地貌对活动断层进行定量研究对理解断层活动习性及预测其将来的活动行为具有重要的意义。目前人们对断层位错的获取主要采取软件测量的方式,因此对断层位错测量工具的可靠性及应用性的分析至关重要。文章首先对3种常用的测量工具LaDicaoz、3D_Fault_Offsets与MCSST进行介绍;然后,基于无人机摄影航测获得的党河水库断裂高精度DEM以及无人机机载LiDAR获取的西秦岭北缘断裂黄香沟段高精度DEM,使用MCSST对党河水库断裂进行详细的陡坎垂直位错测量,利用LaDicaoz和3D_Fault_Offsets对黄香沟断裂进行精细的水平位错测量,并通过交叉检验方法对这3种测量工具的可靠性进行分析;最后,基于不同性质断裂位移的提取过程和结果,对这3款软件的自动化程度、使用难易程度及可重复性等特性进行综合对比分析,并总结3种工具的优势与不足。研究结果表明,LaDicaoz和3D_Fault_Offsets在水平位移提取方面具有较高精度和较好应用,MCSST在垂直位移提取及分析上应用较好,但3种工具的自动化程度皆存在不足,工具间的相互借鉴并将人工智能引入将成为进一步提高测量软件科学性与实用性的发展方向。 Quantitative studies on active faults based on tectonic geomorphology are essential for understanding the activity history and predicting future behavior.Currently,fault dislocations are mainly obtained by measuring tools,which should be analyzed for their reliability and applicability.In this study,three commonly used measuring tools(LaDicaoz,3D_Fault_Offsets,and MCSST)were employed.Subsequently,based on the high-precision DEM obtained by the UAV photogrammetric technique,MCSST was applied to measure the vertical dislocation of fault scarps along the Danghe reservoir fault,and the LaDicaoz and 3D_Fault_Offsets were applied to measure the horizontal dislocation of the Huangxianggou fault.MCSST was used in this study to perform a detailed steep ridge vertical dislocation measurement of the Danghe reservoir fault.LaDicaoz and 3D_Fault_Offsets were utilized for accurate measurement of the horizontal dislocation of the Huangxianggou fault,and the reliability of these three measuring tools was further examined using the cross-checking method.Lastly,based on the extraction process and results,the automation degree,ease of use,repeatability,and other characteristics of the three software programs were compared and analyzed,and their advantages and disadvantages were summarized.Analysis results indicated that LaDicaoz and 3D_Fault_Offsets have high accuracy and decent application in horizontal displacement measurement,and MCSST is better applicable in vertical displacement extraction.However,the automation degree of the three tools needs improvement.This study may further enhance the development of scientific and practical measurement software tools.
作者 王辽 谢虹 朱俊文 薛善余 张正模 张波 WANG Liao;XIE Hong;ZHU Junwen;XUE Shanyu;ZHANG Zhengmo;ZHANG Bo(Gansu Dunhuang Cultural Relics Conservation and Research Center,Dunhuang 736200,Gansu,China;Lanzhou Institute of Seismology,CEA,Lanzhou 730000,Gansu,China;Dunhuang Academy,Dunhuang 736200,Gansu,China)
出处 《地震工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第5期1133-1144,共12页 China Earthquake Engineering Journal
基金 甘肃省敦煌文物保护研究中心开放课题(GDW2021ZD03) 国家自然科学基金项目(42172227) 甘肃省自然科学基金项目(20JR10RA499)。
关键词 活动断裂 位错测量 LIDAR LaDicaoz 3D_Fault_Offsets MCSST active faults dislocation measurement LiDAR LaDicaoz 3D_Fault_Offsets MCSST
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献220

共引文献173

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部