期刊文献+

TenrepNN:集成学习的新范式在企业自律性评价中的实践

TenrepNN:practice of new ensemble learning paradigm in enterprise self-discipline evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了应对互联网环境中企业自律性低、违规事件频发、政府监管困难的现状,提出一种针对企业自律性评价的双层集成残差预测神经网络(TenrepNN)模型,并融合Stacking和Bagging集成学习的思想提出一种集成学习的新范式Adjusting。TenrepNN模型具有两层结构:第1层使用3种基学习器初步预测企业评分;第2层采用残差修正的思想,提出残差预测神经网络以预测每个基学习器的输出偏差。最后,将偏差与基学习器评分相加得到最终输出。在企业自律性评价数据集上,相较于传统的神经网络,TenrepNN模型的均方根误差(RMSE)降低了2.7%,企业自律性等级分类准确率达到了94.51%。实验结果表明,TenrepNN模型集成不同的基学习器降低预测方差,并使用残差预测神经网络显式地降低偏差,从而能够准确评价企业自律性以实现差异化的动态监管。 In order to cope with the current situations of low self-discipline,frequent violation events and difficult government supervision of enterprises in the internet environment,a Two-layer ensemble residual prediction Neural Network(TenrepNN)model was proposed to evaluate the self-discipline of enterprises.And by integrating the ideas of Stacking and Bagging ensemble learning,a new paradigm of integrated learning was designed,namely Adjusting.TenrepNN model has a two-layer structure.In the first layer,three base learners were used to predict the enterprise score preliminarily.In the second layer,the idea of residual correction was adopted,and a residual prediction neural network was proposed to predict the output deviation of each base learner.Finally,the final output was obtained by adding the deviations and the base learner scores together.On the enterprise self-discipline evaluation dataset,compared with the traditional neural network,the proposed model has the Root Mean Square Error(RMSE)reduced by 2.7%,and the classification accuracy in the selfdiscipline level reached 94.51%.Experimental results show that by integrating different base learners to reduce the variance and using residual prediction neural network to decrease the deviation explicitly,TenrepNN model can accurately evaluate enterprise self-discipline to achieve differentiated dynamic supervision.
作者 赵敬涛 赵泽方 岳兆娟 李俊 ZHAO Jingtao;ZHAO Zefang;YUE Zhaojuan;LI Jun(Computer Network Information Center,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100083,China;School of Computer Science and Technology,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China)
出处 《计算机应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第10期3107-3113,共7页 journal of Computer Applications
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFB1405801)。
关键词 企业自律性评价 集成学习范式 残差预测神经网络 显式偏差修正 互联网企业监管 enterprise self-discipline evaluation ensemble learning paradigm residual prediction neural network explicit deviation correction internet enterprise supervision
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献126

  • 1戴大双,雷晓敏,宋家顺.中小企业信用评价中企业家信用评价缺失研究[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2007,28(4):7-11. 被引量:6
  • 2王丽丽,苏德富.基于群体智能的选择性决策树分类器集成[J].计算机技术与发展,2006,16(12):55-57. 被引量:3
  • 3杨绍基,范闽.信用评分模型的拒绝偏差与Heckit纠正[J].南方金融,2007(5):12-15. 被引量:7
  • 4程建,连玉君.信用评分系统的建模及其验证研究[J].国际金融研究,2007(6):50-59. 被引量:12
  • 5Thompson S. Pruning boosted classifiers with a real valued genetic algorithm. Knowledge-Based Systems, 1999, 12(5-6): 277-284.
  • 6Zhou Z H, Tang W. Selective ensemble of decision trees// Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular Computing. Chongqing, China, 2003:476-483.
  • 7Hernandez-Lobato D, Hernandez-Lobato J M, Ruiz-Torrubiano R, Valle A. Pruning adaptive boosting ensembles by means of a genetic algorithm//Corchado et al. International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006: 322- 329.
  • 8Zhang Y, Burer S, Street W N. Ensemble pruning via semidefinite programming. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2006, 7: 1315-1338.
  • 9Chen H H, Tino P, Yao X. Predictive ensemble pruning by expectation propagation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2009, 21(7): 999-1013.
  • 10Dos Santos E M, Sahourin R, Maupin P. Overfitting cautious selection of classifier ensembles with genetic algorithms. Information Fusion, 2009, 10(2): 150-162.

共引文献175

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部