期刊文献+

土壤污染修复责任的溯及力及其限制

Retroactivity and Restriction of Soil Pollution Remediation Liability
原文传递
导出
摘要 土壤污染具有隐蔽性、滞后性、累积性,有关国家和地区土壤污染修复责任的相关规定通常溯及既往,以解决法律事实早于法律施行之日的责任承担问题。我国《土壤污染防治法》在该问题上的规定不是十分明确,导致实践中法律适用不一致、同案不同判的情况时常出现。从解释论的角度综合分析现有法律规范,土壤污染修复责任确实具有溯及既往的效力,且构成真正溯及既往。但基于比例原则、信赖保护原则,溯及既往的适用范围应予严格限制,具体可从溯及时间、违法前提、排污行为、污染范围四方面对溯及适用的相关规则予以明确、细化。 Soil pollution is undetectable,lagging,and cumulative.Regulations related to soil pollution remediation liability in related countries and regions are generally retroactive in order to solve the problem that legal facts occurred before the implementation of laws.The regulation of Soil Pollution Prevention and Control law in China is not very clear,which leads to the problems that inconsistent application of laws and different judgment in the same case often appear in practice.A comprehensive analysis of the existing legal norms from the perspective of interpretive theory shows that soil pollution remediation liability is truly retro⁃active.But based on trust protection principle and proportionality principle,the scope of application of this kind of retroactivity should be strictly limited.The restriction can be made from the four aspects of retroac⁃tive time,illegal premise,discharge behavior and pollution scope.
作者 韩梅 HAN Mei(Collaborative Innovation Center of Judicial Civilization,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)
出处 《行政法学研究》 北大核心 2023年第5期167-176,共10页 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
基金 2021年度国家社会科学基金项目“陆海统筹生态环境治理法律制度研究”(项目编号:21AZD062)。
关键词 土壤污染修复责任 真正溯及既往 比例原则 信赖保护原则 Soil Pollution Remediation Responsibility True Retroactivity Proportionality Principle Trust Protection Principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献86

共引文献175

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部