王学末流的实学思想论辩

A Debate on the Pragmatic Thought Among Post-Yangming Schools

王学分化后,王学末流对阳明之学各取所需,从而出现了种种弊端。王学末流历来被称为“空疏之学”,但细究其实,他们并未完全摒弃阳明学说中的“实学”因素,只是各自的偏重不同罢了,可谓“虚中有实”“务实不虚”。明清间学风转变之际,学者们摒弃王学中虚的因素,吸收利用实学因素,形成了清初实学与王门后学迥然不同的实学面貌。无论是注重实学还是不注重实学的王学末流,其学术思想中皆蕴含着一定的实学因子,这些实学因子被明末清初的学者加以传承、光大,也影响到了当时的学术。

After the division of Yangmingism,Post-Yangming Schools took what they needed from Wang Yangming s doctrine,which led to various drawbacks.Post-Yangming Schools have always been called the School of Void.In fact,they just had different emphases and did not completely abandon the Pragmatic Thought of Wang Yangming.At the time of the transition of the academic style between Ming and Qing Dynasties,scholars abandoned the void factors in Wang Yangmingism,absorbed and utilized the pragmatic factors,forming a different Pragmatic Thought from Post-Yangming Schools.It is certain that there are certain pragmatic factors contained in the academic thoughts of Post-Yangming Schools.These pragmatic factors were inherited and developed by scholars in the late Ming and early Qing Dynasties,which also influenced the academic community at that time.