期刊文献+

利用多源测量数据实时估算整层大气光学湍流

Real-Time Estimation of Whole-Layer Atmospheric Optical Turbulence with Multi-Source Measurement Data
原文传递
导出
摘要 综合利用微波辐射计、风廓线雷达、自动气象站、温度脉动仪及历史探空资料等多源测量数据可实时估算整层大气光学湍流。本文通过构建实时大气参数廓线,计算边界层高度,在边界层和自由大气层分别采用指数递减模式和Dewan外尺度模式估算大气折射率结构常数(C_(n)^(2))廓线,拼接后积分实现了大气相干长度(r_(0))的实时估算,并与相干长度仪实测r_(0)进行了对比。通过误差分析可知,r_(0)的模式估算值与实测值在大气层结不稳定状态均方根误差最小,相关性较好,在稳定和近中性状态均方根误差较大,相关性较差,尤其在近中性状态均方根误差最大。研究结果表明,利用多源大气测量数据,采用分层估算的方法实时估算整层大气光学湍流是可行的,具有一定的工程应用价值。 Objective Atmospheric turbulence causes laser intensity fluctuation,beam drift,and beam spreading,which necessitates the determination of its intensity.Refractive index structure constant(C_(n)^(2))profile and atmospheric coherence length(r_(0))are usually used to describe the atmospheric turbulence in the whole layer.The C_(n)^(2)profile in the whole layer is difficult to measure in real time economically in some cases,and researchers estimate atmospheric turbulence in different ways.C_(n)^(2)profile can be estimated using conventional meteorological parameters or artificial neural networks.Nevertheless,such methods either perform poorly in real time or require a considerable amount of measured data.An atmospheric coherence length monitor is usually employed to measure atmospheric coherence length and the isoplanatic angle,which can be further used for the real-time inversion of C_(n)^(2)profile.However,this instrument is easily affected by bad weather because it needs to track stars continuously.The study proposes a method to estimate the whole-layer atmospheric optical turbulence with multi-source measurement data from the microwave radiometer,wind profiler radar,meteorological sensor,microthermometer,and radiosonde.Being real-time and weather-proof,the proposed method is effective in engineering applications.Methods Specifically,a real-time atmospheric parameter profile is constructed with multi-source measurement data from the microwave radiometer,wind profiler radar,meteorological sensor,and radiosonde.Real-time ground-based data and radiosonde data are spliced together in accordance with the coefficients of correction at different heights.Then,this study distinguishes the atmospheric stratification state and calculates boundary layer height according to the distribution characteristics of the potential temperature gradient with the data from the microwave radiometer.After that,the C?profile in the boundary layer is estimated by applying the exponential decline model,using real-time data from the microthermometer.The exponential decline index is-3/4 during the daytime and-2/3 at night.The C_(n)^(2)profile in the free atmosphere is estimated by employing the Dewan outer-scale model,using the previously constructed real-time atmospheric parameter profile.Furthermore,the C_(n)^(2)profiles in the two layers are spliced together to estimate ro according to the integral relationship between the two layers.Finally,the estimated ro is compared with the value measured by the atmospheric coherence length monitor.Results and Discussions The calculated boundary layer height varies from hundreds of meters at night to more than three thousand meters in the afternoon,and it is based on the previously constructed real-time atmospheric parameter profile data from August 3 to August 5(Fig.2).The estimated C_(n)^(2)profiles in the boundary layer and free atmosphere are spliced together,and the results show that C_(n)^(2)decreases with fluctuations,as altitude increases from ground level to 25 km.The order of magnitude of the estimated C,decreases from 10^(-15)to 10^(-19)at night and in the morning and from 10^(-14)to 10^(-19)during the daytime(Fig.3).The estimated ro has the same order of magnitude and daily variation trend as those of the measured values.The consistency between them is fair in unstable atmospheric stratification but poor in the case of stable and near-neutral atmospheric stratifications(Fig.4).The deviation is maximum in near-neutral atmospheric stratification,when the atmospheric turbulence near the ground is weak(Fig.5).The root-mean-square error(RMSE)between the estimated r_(0)and the measured r_(0)is 2.988 in unstable atmosphere stratification,6.858 in near-neutral atmospheric stratification,and 5.088 in stable atmosphere stratification.The correlation in unstable atmospheric stratification is much better than that in stable or near-neutral atmospheric stratifications(Table 2).In addition,the estimated r_(0)in the two component layers is compared with that in the whole layer obtained by applying the Dewan model.The RMSE between the estimated r_(0)and the measured r_(0)shows that the estimated r_(0)in the whole layer is slightly more consistent than that in the two component layers.Nevertheless,the standard deviation shows that the estimated r_(0)in the two component layers is much less fluctuant than that in the whole layer(Fig.7).The deviation of the estimated r_(0)from the measured r_(0)is caused by several reasons.First,the atmospheric turbulence model has a technical route different from that of instrument measurement.Second,the applicability of the atmospheric turbulence model is doubtful in the sense that the similarity theory of turbulence is probably false in stable or near-neutral atmospheric stratification.Last but not least,data fusion and processing may also cause estimation errors.Conclusions Multi-source atmospheric measurement data are used to estimate C_(n)^(2)profile and r_(0)in real time.The results show that the estimated r_(0)has the same order of magnitude and daily variation trend as those of the measured r_(0).Moreover,the RMSE is minimum in unstable atmospheric stratification and maximum in stable atmospheric stratification,and the correlation in unstable atmospheric stratification is better than that in stable or near-neutral atmospheric stratification.Analysis proves that the whole-layer atmospheric optical turbulence can be estimated in real time by estimating the C_(n)^(2)profile in the two component layers with multi-source measurement data.The proposed method provides better real-time performance in estimating the whole-layer atmospheric optical turbulence and can validate instrument measurement in some cases.Therefore,it has great engineering application significance.Since the key to this method is to estimate the C_(n)^(2)profile in the boundary layer accurately,modifying the atmospheric turbulence model for the boundary layer is important for improving estimation accuracy.
作者 耿丹 朱文越 彭进先 罗金鹏 青春 刘强 Geng Dan;Zhu Wenyue;Peng Jinxian;Luo Jinpeng;Qing Chun;Liu Qiang(Unit 63611 of PLA,Korla 841000,Xinjiang,China;Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Optics,Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics,Hefei Institutes of Physical Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Hefei 230031,Anhui,China;Advanced Laser Technology Laboratory of Anhui Province,Hefei 230037,Anhui,China)
出处 《光学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第18期234-241,共8页 Acta Optica Sinica
基金 先进激光安徽省实验室基金(AHL2021QN02) 中国科学院重点实验室创新基金(CXJJ-21S028)。
关键词 大气与海洋光学 大气湍流 多源测量数据 大气湍流模式 折射率结构常数 大气相干长度 atmospheric and ocean optics atmospheric turbulence multi-source measurement data atmospheric turbulence model refractive index structure constant atmospheric coherence length
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献120

共引文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部