从“实在性”角度谈虚拟财产物权性

On the property right of virtual property from the perspective of“reality”

通过对《民法典》的分析,文章认为其在明确虚拟财产系民法所保护的民事权利地位后,对物的定义并没有再局限于物是否有实体表现形式,这为虚拟财产纳入物权调整体系提供了理论支持。虚拟财产的“虚拟性”表征并非其纳入当前法律制度调整范围的根本原因,明晰虚拟物的财产性产生本源,讨论虚拟财产的“实在性”,确定虚拟财产仍属物之范畴,“实在性”才是物的价值性产生基础。虚拟财产权特征无法与债权体系相适配,更适宜物权体系,结合侵权责任法能更好地保障权利人合法权益,在物权定位下可为司法实践的虚拟财产侵权纠纷提供体系性法律依据。

Through the analysis of the Civil Code,it is clear that the virtual property is the status of civil rights protected by civil law,and the definition of the object is no longer limited to whether the object has a substantive form of expression,which provides theoretical support for the inclusion of virtual property in the real right adjustment system.The characterization of“virtuality”of virtual property is not the root cause of its inclusion in the adjustment scope of the current legal system.Clarifying the origin of the property of virtual property,discussing the“reality”of virtual property,and determining that virtual property still belongs to the category of things,“reality”is the basis for the value of things.The characteristics of virtual property rights cannot be adapted to the creditors rights system,which is more suitable for the property rights system.Combined with the tort liability law,it can better protect the legitimate rights and interests of the right holders,and can provide a systematic legal basis for virtual property infringement disputes in judicial practice under the positioning of property rights.