期刊文献+

WBC、CRP、SAA、PCT和ESR在肺结核与社区获得性肺炎鉴别诊断中的应用 被引量:8

The Application of WBC, CRP, SAA, PCT and ESR in the Differential Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Community-acquired Pneumonia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨WBC、CRP、SAA、PCT和ESR在肺结核(PTB)与社区获得性肺炎(CAP)鉴别诊断中的临床应用价值。方法 选取明确诊断的72例PTB患者(PTB组)及74例CAP患者(CAP组)纳为研究对象,分析两组患者WBC、CRP、SAA、PCT和ESR水平的差异,比较上述实验室指标对两种疾病的鉴别诊断价值。结果 (1)PTB组CRP、PCT及ESR水平显著高于CAP组(P<0.05),WBC、SAA水平在PTB组和CAP组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)CRP、PCT及ESR在PTB与CAP鉴别诊断中的AUC分别为:0.599(95%CI 0.507~0.691)、0.623(95%CI 0.532~0.714)和0.715(95%CI 0.631~0.798),且均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);SAA在两组疾病鉴别诊断中的AUC无统计学意义(P>0.05);当ESR取值27.00时(灵敏度为68.1%,特异性为64.9%),为鉴别两种疾病的最佳临界值。(3)CRP与SAA在PTB组和CAP组中都呈现极强正相关(r=0.817,P<0.001;r=0.838,P<0.001)。结论 WBC和SAA水平不能作为炎症标志物来鉴别PTB和CAP,ESR、CRP及PCT在上述两种疾病的鉴别诊断中有一定价值,其中ESR的价值较高,其可作为鉴别诊断的一个有效指标。 Objective To investigate the clinical application value of WBC,CRP,SAA,PCT and ESR in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis(PTB)and community-acquired pneumonia(CAP).Methods Seventy-two patients with PTB(PTB group)and 74 patients with CAP(CAP group)were selected as the study objects.The differences of WBC,CRP,SAA,PCT and ESR levels between the two groups were analyzed,and the differential diagnosis value of the above laboratory indicators for the two diseases was compared.Results(1)Levels of CRP,PCT and ESR in the PTB group were significantly higher than those in the CAP group(P<0.05),while levels of WBC and SAA were not significantly different between the PTB and CAP groups(P>0.05).(2)AUCs of CRP,PCT and ESR in the differential diagnosis of PTB and CAP were 0.599(95%CI 0.507-0.691),0.623(95%CI 0.532-0.714)and 0.715(95%CI 0.631-0.798),respectively,and all of them were statistically significant(P<0.05);AUC of SAA in the differential diagnosis of the two groups of diseases was not statistically significant(P>0.05);An ESR value of 27.00(sensitivity 68.1%,specificity 64.9%)was found to be the optimal threshold for distinguishing the two diseases.(3)CRP showed an extremely strong positive correlation with SAA in both the PTB and CAP groups(r=0.817,P<0.001;r=0.838,P<0.001).Conclusion WBC and SAA cannot be used as inflammatory markers to distinguish PTB from CAP.ESR,CRP and PCT have certain clinical value in the differential diagnosis of these two diseases,among which ESR has a higher value and can be used as a valid index for the differential diagnosis.
作者 刘玉梅 王栋 LIU Yumei;WANG Dong(Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine,Hankou Hospital of Wuhan,Hankou Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430012,China;Department of Clinical Laboratory,Wuhan Asia General Hospital,Wuhan Asia General Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University ofScience and Technology,Wuhan 430056,China)
出处 《标记免疫分析与临床》 CAS 2023年第9期1527-1530,1570,共5页 Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine
基金 武汉亚心总医院科研创新基金项目(编号:2022KYCX1-B09)。
关键词 肺结核 社区获得性肺炎 血红细胞沉降率 血清淀粉样蛋白A 鉴别诊断 Pulmonary tuberculosis Community-acquired pneumonia ESR SAA Differential diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献150

共引文献2650

同被引文献92

引证文献8

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部